'Awful' big blue ring prompts public art policy change

Councillors have approved changes to city halls public art policy, a move prompted by a controversial blue ring in northeast Calgary.

The city currently spends one per cent of the value of its capital projects on public art, but a committee votedlast week toroll thatback on major projects and cap the totalon the biggest ones.City council votedMonday to approve those changes.

• Calgary committee votes to spend less on public art
• Mayor calls $470K blue ring billed as public art 'awful'

The one per cent target will remainin place for projects worth up to $50 million, then it willbe half a per cent above that with the maximum topping out at$4 million.

Members of the public will be given more say on what works are selected by an advisory panel and the amount of money that can be spent on public art would be capped.

Ward 12 Coun.Shane Keating pushed for changes after the installation on a northeast Calgary bridge of Travelling Light, better known as the big blue ring. Mayor NaheedNenshi called the piece of art"awful."

It had to be changed, this is a great start and the fact that we're going to review it in another year as far as funding and what's spent and what isn't, is another fabulous thing, said Keating.

Ward 11 Coun. Brian Pincott voted against any bid to cut publicart spending.

When we put this public art policy in place, we were one of the first to have a one per cent for public art. It's now a standard.