City council slows down Red Hill, Linc widening debate

After a short but heated exchange that pit the five lower city councillorsagainst the rest,Hamilton city council voted Wednesday to wrap a study of widening the Red Hill Valley Expressway and the Lincoln M. Alexander Expressway into an ongoing review of the citywide Transportation Master Plan.

That decision blocks a move by councillor Doug Conley to have a separate study done onwidening specifically the two roads outsidethe context of the city's other infrastructure and transportation needs. The overall transportation plan isexpected to come before council for discussion in fall 2016.

I think there was some concern I was trying to jump the queue.- Con. Doug Conley

The idea to wrap it in got a more favourable reaction than themotion from Conleyto both look at widening the parkways and ask the province and the feds for money to support it. Conley was the only councillor to oppose the idea to wrap it into the larger transportation plan.

The lower city councillors, Aidan Johnson, Jason Farr, Matthew Green, Sam Merullaand Chad Collinsopposed the idea ofdoinga separate, extra study just to focus on the Red Hill and Linc widening and to ask the federal and provincial governments for funding.

"I think there was some concern I was trying to jump the queue," Conley said. "My enthusiastic approach gave that perception."

But he said he didn't necessarily mean the road widening should be presented ahead of other needs.

• City will study expanding Red Hill and Linc to 6 lanes
• YOUR THOUGHTS:Should drivers on the Linc and Red Hill Valley parkway pay tolls?
• City council set to debate Red Hill and Linc widening

We're thinking likeHamiltoniansfrom 1950.- Coun. Sam Merulla

'The most divisive issue'

Mayor Fred Eisenberger said the road widening was not a personalpriority for him but said he could imagine the constituent complaints about traffic that Conley's office is getting.

Ward 4 Coun. Sam Merulla called the topic the "most divisive issue in the city."

He praised the Red Hill's economic impact and said the road should take much of the credit for the "renaissance" of Hamilton's east end and places like the Ottawa Street Business Improvement Area. But he said highlighting these two roads without knowing how they compare the rest of the transportation and infrastructure needs in the city was misguided.

"We're thinking like Hamiltonians from 1950 as opposed to the new Hamiltonians that are moving here," Merulla said. He said people who move to Hamilton from Toronto and elsewhere don't want to commute in the car; they want to commute via public transit.

Merulla and Collins voted against Conley's proposal tolook into the feasibility ofexpanding the two highways from four lanes to sixin a committee meeting last week,saying it sends an unclear message to the province and feds about Hamilton's infrastructure priorities.

"I'm just concerned that this is the project that we're choosing, and I'm not certain at this point that it's warranted," Collins said.

Coun. Terry Whitehead pushed back on Merulla's assessment, sayinghis concern about congestion on those roads is"not just about commuting residents," but was also about the businesses in the area.

Gerry Davis, the city's director of public works, said that he did not have information to present on Wednesday about how much congestion there is on the Red Hill and Lincparkways, whichfunction like highways, but he said that traffic often moves at speeds higher than 115 km/h even though the speed limit is 90 km/h.

"We're debating this tonight and we're still not aware of how congested it is or when that congestion occurs," said Coun. Jason Farr.

Catch up on this discussion and other items from Wednesday's agenda here.