Fed could calm anxious markets by raising rates - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 07:00 PM | Calgary | -11.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
BusinessAnalysis

Fed could calm anxious markets by raising rates

Holding off an increase in U.S. interest rates is just adding to the apprehension. There is an easy way for Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen to pop the anxiety bubble, says Don Pittis: Raise rates a little and demonstrate that apocalypse will not ensue.

Fear of an increase is worse than the fact would be

Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen smiles prior to testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington. Rather than shying away from a rate rise, Don Pittis says, Yellen should cut rates by a quarter per cent a soon as possible, just to show she can. (Associated Press)

It's like an anvil hanging over your headon a frayed string. As ominous as the sword of Damocles. A bit like that wobbly ceiling fan that spun in ovals above my bed in the Raj-era hotel somewhere in India. Who knewwhen it wouldfall?

To hear the latest analysis, we have everything to fear from today's Fed pronouncement.

According to most commentators, the earth-shaking expectation for today's monetary policy statement in the United Statesis that Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellenwill, gasp, remove the word "patient."

What I'm saying is, the Fed has been too darn patient.

As I have noted before, central bank statements are soopaquethat teams of acolytes mustread the runesand examine the entrails of every paragraph. In this case, the repeated use of the word "patient" in the last few statements has been taken as a signal that the Fed will not raise interest rates any time soon.

The reason they are so reluctant to even hint at a rate rise, and why various commentators are warning about such a change of language, is the supposed chaos that would ensue following an increase. We are supposed to be in terror that the string will unravel and the anvil will fall.

I've written lotsabout the impact of rate changes on markets, so I won't go into that in detail.

International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde adds her warning: A Fed rate increase "could give rise to potential stability risks." (Press Trust of India/Associated Press)

Suffice to say that the conventional view is that higher interest rates are bad for markets and a drag on the economy. And many analysts have warned that the threat ofa sudden rise in rates will shock and destabilize markets just as they did in the so-called "taper tantrum" when the Fed was hinting it would scale back or "taper" thebond buyingof quantitative easing.

But we should beware of pointing the fingerat just those crazy media commentators. Because, asBloomberghas reported,no less a personage thatInternational Monetary Fund boss Christine Lagardeexpressedsimilar fears.

"Even if this process is well managed, the likely volatility in financial markets could give rise to potential stability risks, Lagarde warned Tuesday.

Call me contrarian, but I'd says Lagarde has it exactly wrong.

The best thing Yellen could do is raise rates as soon as possible and thus showthatworld does notend. And the taper tantrum is a perfect example of why that would be a good idea.

It's true that markets swooned more that once in anticipation of the tapering thatwould end quantitative easing. But once the tapering began, everybody got over it. The bogeyman just wasn't so scary when you could see him in the light of day and realize it made almost no difference to the parts of the economy that really counted.

U.S. employment rose. Markets continued to climb.

The same applies to interest rate rises. We know they have to come eventually. History may not tell us how long interest will stay low, but it does tell us that that interest rates will not stay at an effective zero per cent forever. In a recovering economy, rate increases are a fact of life.

As with the taper tantrum, markets and their analysts have got themselves into such a stateanticipating an increase in interest rates that it creates an absurd additional barrier preventing Yellen from doing her job.

At some point, Yellen and her team at the Federal Open MarketCommittee will decide that it must adjust rates. But because of the current state of apprehension, making that first change will carry an unnecessary weight.

That is why the best thing Yellen could do would be to raise rates by a quarter of oneper centwhether markets really need it or not, just to break the ice. Just to show she can.

As we saw so clearly this week in Canada withthe Bank of Montreal's surprise 5-year mortgage interest rate cutto a record low of 2.79 per cent,the whole world seems to have decided that interest ratesnever go up and only go down. It is time for Yellen to correct that notion.