Keystone XL pipeline: Alberta will not lobby U.S.

Amid talk U.S. President Obama is about to reject the Keystone XL pipeline,AlbertaEnergy Minister Marg McCuaig-Boyd says the provincial government will not intervene.

"It's in their hands," McCuaig-Boyd saidin an interview.

North Dakota RepublicanSenator John Hoevensaid this weekthat Obama will reject theproposed pipeline, and that the announcement will be madein August, after Congress adjourns for its summer break.

Obamathinks it's better to disappoint the Canadians ...and please the environmentalistswho are much more vocal- Chris Sands, Hudson Institute

That comment was given additional heft Wednesday when White House deputy press secretary Eric Schultzsaid that a decision on Keystone would come during this administration.

• Hillary Clinton dodges Keystone XL pipeline question at town hall

• Canada needs better access to crude oil markets: Rickford

The proposed pipeline would move bitumenfrom Alberta's oilsands to refineries in Texas. It has faced intense environmental opposition, both over concerns about leaks from the pipeline and about how much oilsands pipelines add to globalgreenhouse gas emissions.

Hoeven said Obama would rejectKeystone on environmental grounds.

Focus on other pipelines

During the Alberta election campaign, now-PremierRachel Notley said she would not make trips to the United States to lobby for Keystone XL. Thatpolicycontinues to holdnow that the NDP is in government

"We're going with the ones that are probably going to have the most success soonest," McCuaig-Boydsaid."Energy East hassome promise and so does Kinder Morgan's TransMountain. Those are the two right now to put our energies into."

McCuaig-Boyd said that Keystone XL is too caught up in U.S. politics to intervene.

"Ithink with the election coming and a few others things, it's in their hands more than ours."

'If he says anything, he'll say no'

"I think if he[Obama]says anything, he'll say no,"said Christopher Sands, a fellow with the Hudson Institute think-tank in Washington, D.C.

Sands agrees with McCuaig-BoydthatKeystone XL is politically tricky.

Democratic presidential candidateHillary Clintondodged a question in a town hall on Tuesday, refusing to answerwhether she would sign a bill allowing the pipeline.

"The White House might be thinking that if the president simply rejects it now, then Hillary Clinton can say, 'Well, I always said it was up to the president, he made this decision, the company can always file again,"said Sands.

"That allows her to kick this offher plate."

Does Alberta still need Keystone?

Despite lower energy prices, market access remains top of mind for Alberta's energysector. Production in the oilsands is stillincreasing andshipping oil by rail ismore expensive that shipping it via pipeline.

As oil prices have slid, so have shipments of oil by rail. In the first quarter of 2015, exports of oil by railwere at their lowest level in two years.

TransCanada spokesman James Miller said in an interview that the pipeline is still needed.

"Our trigger for building a pipeline, such as Keystone, is we need to sign long-termbindingcontracts with those companies" who want to ship oil to Gulf Coast refineries.

"One thing we've been consistently able to do in the midst of all the controversy over the lastseven years is to maintain 100 per cent shipper support," he said.

However, while energy companies continue to support Keystone XL, they are also finding other ways to get oil to those Texas refineries.Both TransCanada and its competitor Enbridge have been working on end-runs around Keystone, projects such as Enbridge's Seaway Pipeline and TransCanada'sMarketlink.

Those efforts appear to be working.The amount of crude exported from Canada to the Gulf Coast nearly doubled between April 2014 to April 2015, according to data from the U.S. EnergyInformation Administration.

Harper not hopeful

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said in an interview with Bloomberg that the delays in approving Keystone XL are not a hopeful sign.

That lack of hope isprobably appropriate,Sands said.

"I think probably, with the base fired up, Obama thinks it's better to disappoint the Canadians and the business communityand please the environmentalists, who are much more vocal."