A $5,000 Bell bill? Parents struggle with runaway wireless charges

Heather Gunn-LaBrie is still paying off a surprise $5,000 Bell billfor long distance and talkminutes charges,racked up by her 16-year-old son late last year.

"It is the most horrific feeling,"said Gunn-LaBrie who lives in Edmonton and shares a small business wireless plan with her son and husband.

"This is an obscene amount of stress put on my family."

A newly releasedsurvey commissioned by the CRTC Canada's telecom regulator suggestsmany Canadians strugglewith surprisewireless charges. Of 1,152 wireless customers surveyed by phone in September, 24 per cent said they experienced bill shock within the past year. That number climbed to 29 per cent for those with shared plans.

Gunn-LaBrie and some other parents recently hit with big wireless bills arguethere should be more protections in placeto help curb runawaycharges, especially when sharing plans with minors.

The CRTC has implemented regulationsto helpprotect customers from mountingdata and roaming fees. However, when it comes to texting, or in Gunn-LaBrie's caselong distance and talkminutes charges, the same regulations don't apply.

"It's appalling," she said. "That's really a double standard."

'An absolute shock'

Gunn-LaBrie's troubles began when, from mid-October to early December, her son ran up $6,774 in charges, largelyfor long distance calls to his girlfriend who lives 150 kmfrom their home in Edmonton.

Bell initiallyforgave$521 of the amount.It then kicked inanother$1,163 after Gunn-LaBrie filed a complaint with the Commission for Complaints for Telecom-Television Services a telecom watchdog.

She's paying down the remaining $5,090 in installments because that's all she can afford.

"It's just a huge weight sitting on us."

When she got herplan, Gunn-LaBrie believed she had signed up her son for unlimited Canada-wide calling. She only learned of the unexpected charges when she opened both her November and December bills in early December.

"It was an absolute shock," said LaBrie,who wishes she had received awarning when thecharges were pilingup."If I had gotten one single notification, I would've had it resolved in a heartbeat."

Bell said it sent 11 text alerts about mounting charges to the user racking them up,and that Gunn-LaBrie is listed as the account holder on each line on her plan.

She saidher son recalls receiving a few alerts, but heignored thembecause he thought they involved his mom's bill and that she would get them too but she didn't.

Bell also said it calledthree timesand left messages. Gunn-LaBriesaid she received no calls and, after inquiring, her sonrecalledbeing contacted by Bell, but was unclear what itwas about.

'I should have received a notification'

Joy and Dave Zylstra in Edmonton are also still struggling to pay offa big Bell bill: $1,800 in texting charges to the U.S., recently racked up by their 14-year-old daughter on the family's shared plan.

Again, only the daughter's phonereceived Bell alerts, which she ignored, thinking they weren'tmeant for her.

"I should have received a notification," said Dave Zylstra. "I could have immediately realized there was an issue and dealt with it."

Desiree Goodwin of Port Elgin, N.B., also wishes she had received a notificationafter getting asurprise $635 Telus bill in long distance and talkminutes charges. They were run up by her son aged 18 at the timefrom mid-October to mid-November on the family's shared plan.

Telus refunded $343 of the amount "as an act of goodwill," leaving Goodwin with a $292 bill. The telco also said that it helped Goodwin remedy the problem by switching her son's planto a similarly priced one with unlimited nationwide talk and text.

"I was almost in tears," said Goodwin when she first discovered the charges. "There should be a limit that you can set."

That limit is already in place but only for data and roaming fees, not for long distance, talk minutes or textingcharges.

To help prevent bill shock, the CRTC mandates that telcos must cut customers off once they hit $50 in data or $100 in roaming fees unless customers consent to further charges.

In the case of shared plans, the account owner mustprovide that consenta rule the CRTC introduced in 2017 following complaints about teens running up data charges.

'Pernicious pricing mechanism'

Consumer advocate John Lawford believes the CRTC's rules for data and roaming charges should apply to all wirelessfees.

"Overage fees are a pernicious pricing mechanism," said Lawford, executive director of the Ottawa-based Public Interest Advocacy Centre.

"You just shouldn'thave to open up your bill and go, 'Oh, it's four figures.' Most people can't afford that."

In an email to CBC News, the CRTC said that when it created its Wireless Code regulations in 2013 and then updated them in 2017, it was determined that data and roaming charges were the main sources of bill shock.

The telecom regulator said thatmanaging added texting, long distance and talk minutes costshave,"over time, become more intuitive to consumers."

But that's not always the case. Respondents in the latest CRTC-commissioned survey cited long distance fees as the third biggest reason for customers' bill shock, following data and roaming charges.

In a previousCRTC survey conducted in September 2016, talkminute overageswascited as the third largestculprit, following data and roaming charges.

The big three telcos, Bell, Telus and Rogers each said that they provide customers with online tools to help them closely monitor all lines in a phone plan. They also said that customers can modify their plans to incorporate unlimited offerings if they're running up overage fees.