Stanley Park bike lane debate resumes after disruptive Vancouver Park Board meeting - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 07:43 PM | Calgary | -11.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

Stanley Park bike lane debate resumes after disruptive Vancouver Park Board meeting

The Vancouver ParkBoard continued to hear from public speakers Tuesday evening about the future of bike lanes in Stanley Park after Monday's meeting was abruptly cut short.

Security staff, park rangers were present at the Tuesday meeting to ensure safety

Cyclists and cars share the road through Stanley Park in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Tuesday, June 23, 2020. The short-term future of the dedicated bike lane in the park is on the table at a city park board meeting Monday.
Cyclists and cars share the road through Stanley Park in Vancouver, B.C. in June 2020. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

The Vancouver ParkBoard continued to hear from the public onTuesday evening about the future of bike lanes in Stanley Park after Monday's meeting was abruptly cut short.

The meeting was ended by Park BoardCommissioner Camil Dumont, who was acting as meeting chair, after "disruption" caused by members of the public in the gallery, according to a statement by General Manager Donnie Rosa.

Tensions ran high between Dumont and public speakers on Monday, the last of whomcalled park boardstaff a "disgrace" and described staff and the mobility study as ideologically motivated.

On Tuesday, the meeting resumed with members of the public continuing to speak passionately, albeit more respectfully, in support of or opposition to keeping the bike lanes in Stanley Park.

A man in a green high-visibility jacket rides a bicycle down a bike path.
A cyclist rides on a designated bike path in Vancouver. The Vancouver Park Board continued to hear from the public on Tuesday, about the future of bike lanes in Stanley Park after Monday's meeting was abruptly cut short. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

Before hearing from speakers, Dumont read out Rosa's written statement in response to the Monday night meeting.

The statement said multiple members of the public had yelled at commissioners and staff in attendance, swearing and pounding on the chamber doors. It also said a speaker was heckled as they left the podium.

"To be clear, the Park Board welcomes passionate debate and dialogue," reads Rosa's written statement. "Last night's meeting took a turn that meant we could not ensure the safety of the public, staff and commissioners."

The general manager said park rangers had to escort commissioners and staff out of the building on Monday.

Security staff and park rangers were present at Tuesday's meeting as a result.

Parkboard to vote on mobility study

The parkboard is meeting to decide on the future of the Stanley Park mobility plan, which aims to reduce vehicle traffic in the park. The plan has been criticized for being discriminatory toward those with accessibility issues.

In 2020, at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the park was closed to vehicles to allow more room for bicycles, while the seawall was dedicated to pedestrians. Currently, one lane of Stanley Park Drive is open to vehicle traffic and one lane is dedicated to cycling traffic. Planners are working to determine if this change, or others, are worth making permanent.

Commissioners are not yet voting on whether to keep the bike lane itself, but rather deciding whetherto approve a recommendation from parks staff about the principles that should guide the mobility study of Stanley Park.

The six proposed guiding principles are safety, accessibility, economic vitality, climate action and environmental protection, a flexible and resilient system, a connected transportation network,and an enhanced park experience.

Only three speakers were heard before the meeting was recessed Monday. Over 40 members of the public had signed up to speak at the meeting.

On Tuesday, Dumont repeatedly had to remind speakers that they were meant to speak to their support or opposition to the proposed guiding principles, and not the future of the bike lane.