Rob Vagramov's sexual assault charge is political, whether he likes it or not

At 1 a.m. on Wednesday morning, Port Moody, B.C., Mayor RobVagramovsaid it was unfortunate everything had gotten so political.

"I completely acknowledge ...there are folks in the community who have disagreed with my decision to return," he said, after city council voted in favour of asking him to take a leave of absence while his sexual assault charge remains unresolved.

"But at the council table ... I definitely see this issue being politicized," he said.

In his next breath, Vagramovsaid he was gladto see council pass motions in favour ofhis agenda including one instancewhere he cast the tie-breaking vote.

"I'm excited to see that these big priorities are moving forward, and we're getting back on track here at city hall," he said.

And therein lies the rub. Vagramovsupporters accusecouncillorsof trying torefightthe last election by politicizing the sexual assault charge and asking him to step down.

And the council is split on many subjects, meaning Vagramov could cast a deciding vote on controversial issues for the next three years.

There are no provincial guidelines to help them navigate the rare situation of having a mayor charged with a crime who will not step aside.

This has placed Port Moody's city council in a painful position, where politics are almost unavoidable.

Road eliminated, Moody Centre judgment delayed

Vagramov won a narrow victory to become mayor in the last civic election andwas charged with sexual assault in March for an alleged incident that occurred in 2015. By thenthe city's political culture was already divided. Vagramov voluntarily left city hall for five months after the charges, but recently returned.

That tension has escalatedin recent months in public andsocial media. Council voted 4-3 on Tuesday eveningto ask Vagramov to leave again. The mayor has not said whether he will do so.

After that vote, amotion was presented byVagramovon one of his biggest election promises: pledging to remove a right-of-way for a potential road through Bert Flinn Park to lands in the north of the city currently owned by developers.

With Vagramov away for five months, the issue had been tied up in a 3-3 vote, but he cast the deciding vote to remove the possibility of the road from the city's transportation plan.

Immediately after that, council debated another Vagramov motionto provide feedback to developerson what sort of plan they would like to see submitted for the area surrounding Moody Centre SkyTrain station.The initial motion said the preliminary plan which not all councillors have seen in full didn't match "current public sentiment," leading to Coun.Meghan Lahti to begin shouting at Vagramov.

"How the hell do we know what public sentiment is?" said Lahti. "This is hijackinga process that we as a group should have participated in."

In the end, council voted to defer the Moody Centre discussion to another day.

'No clear process'

The reason council is simultaneouslyasking Vagramov to leave while moving forward on his agenda ismostly due to Coun.Amy Lubik. She voted in favour of asking him to take a leave of absence, but also voted in favour of removing the right-of-way and has generally voted with the mayor.

She haslamentedthe lack of provincial guidelinesto deal with a situation like this.

"There's no clear process on a very emotional issue," she said."I wish we weren't in this situation in our community. It's an emotional issue, and it's dividing our community, and for oddly complex reasons."

Whatever the reasons Port Moody is in this messy standoff intertwining policy and ethics and ifVagramov and council can't resolve it voters may have to wait three years to pass judgment on all involved.