Vancouver council candidates square off in housing and homelessness forum

A byelection debate in Vancouver on Thursday evening ended not with sparks flying, but with cordiality.

"I think what's exciting is we've talked about innovative ideas," said NPA candidate Hector Bremner, one of five candidates on stage atSt. Andrew's-Wesley United Church, as the night wrapped up.

Bremner, Vision Vancouver candidate Diego Cardona, Green candidate Pete Fry, OneCity candidate Judy Gravesand Jean Swanson an independent endorsed by COPE discussed housing and homelessness for two hours in front of a crowd of about100 people.

Sensible Vancouver candidate Mary Jean "Watermelon" Dunsdon, along with independents Gary Lee, Damian Murphy and Joshua Wasilenkoff, did not attend the forum.

The byelectionwas promptedafter formerVisioncouncillorGeoff Meggs resignedto becomePremier John Horgan'schief of staff.

Focus on Swanson's 'mansion tax'

Candidates were generally in agreement on issues of homelessness, and generally in agreement on the need for more help from provincial and federal government.

But there were still substantive disagreements between the five, particularlyon Bremner's proposal for large-scale rezoning of neighbourhoods, andonSwanson's proposals to push for a rent freezeand a surtax on properties valued over $5 million.

"It's a crisis, everyone knows it's a crisis, and we need a source of revenue to deal with it. And a mansion tax would provide that, and wouldn't hurt people very much," said Swanson, who credited her campaign with shaping discussion of the byelection.

Fry, who has focused on a number of smaller policies and the effectiveness of a second Green Party member on Vancouver councilrather than any one particular idea, was skeptical of Swanson's approach.

"My big thing is focusing on what we can actually do as a city," he said.

"Big bold ideas that are not fulfillablereally breed political cynicism. It's like an empty promise. I'm far more interested in things we can do right here, right now."

Vision Vancouver vs. B.C. Liberals

Another theme of the evening was the effectiveness of the ruling Vision Vancouver party in combating homelessness and affordability, with the 21-year-oldCardonain the difficult task of defending his party for years of decisions he had no involvement in.

"We need to do a better job of listening ... but it doesn't mean we have to go back to the past," he said, acknowledging that Vision hadn't met its goal of ending street homelessness," he said.

"Having those goals, having that mindset, is important. It shows how committed we are to these issues."

Bremner, a longtime aide to former cabinet minister Rich Coleman, criticized Vision often for their relationship with the B.C. Liberals when they were in government.

But he faced jeers from some in the crowd after he declined to answer a question on the legacy of the Liberal government, instead keeping up his attacks on Vision Vancouver.

After the debate, he was unapologetic for his focus.

"It's not a referendum of what happened in Victoria. It's a referendum of what's happened in Vancouver. Gregor Robertson has been the mayor for nearly a decade now. Why do we keep on having the conversation on punting the blame to someone else?" he said.

"Everything is piecemeal, infinitesimallysmallincrementalism, and it's not good enough. The Liberals aren't in Victoria anymore, okay? We can move on."

Not joining in negative comments for most of the night was Graves, the longtime city advocate for the homeless.

"I'm not interested in making enemies," she said. "I've never yet met a person who cannot be part of the solution."

Election day is Oct. 14.