Oilpatch hopes new pact will raise investor confidence, save sector up to $60M

Canada's energy sector hopesa new trade pact with the U.S. and Mexico will giveinvestor confidence a much-needed lift, while also saving theindustry tens of millions of dollars annually.

The uncertainty hanging over NAFTA'sfuture had been a worry to the oilpatch, adding topersisting concernsabout Canada's ability to attract investment in the wake ofits struggles to build new pipeline infrastructure.

• What we know about the new USMCA trade deal
• Canadian dollar soars, stocks rise on trade deal optimism

"The uncertainty in whetherNAFTAwould exist was definitely having an impact on the market," saidNick Schultz, vice-president of pipeline regulations at the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.

"It is, of course, not the only issue we have with competitiveness and investors, but [a tradeagreement]is an important step."

Also under the new agreement, aborder bottleneckthat cost Canadian oil producers as much as $50-$60 million every year also appears to have been addressed.

Under the old NAFTA rules, oil and gas producers had to prove the origin of their product right back to the wellhead if they were to be exempt from duty at the border.

The difficulty was with the diluent that was mixed with oilsands bitumen to help it flow through a pipeline, Schultz said.

"You have to establish the origin of the product if you want to have the preferential access under NAFTA," he said.

The diluent is a light oil which makes the heavier oil flow and sometimes it comes into Canada as an import.

It became increasingly difficult at the U.S. border to prove either light or heavy oil moving through was of Canadian origin, Schultz said.

"Before Canadian oiltravels,it comes from different producers and is mixed in tanks and traded multiple times," he said.

In part, it was U.S. officials being sticky at the border over the rules of origin of the oil, as they would demand documentation for all of the product, he said.

As a result, both heavy and light oil producers were paying 5.5 to 10 cents a barrel in fees. Schultz estimates heavy oil producers paid $20-$30 million in fees and light oil producers an equivalent amount.

Schultz says the newtrade agreement allows a proportion of diluent up to about 30 per cent without Canadian producers paying that fee. But he said he's not clear whether the problem of having to provide extensive documentation of the origin of an energy product has been eliminated.

With the original NAFTA agreement, we were very worried that it would take away our energy sovereignty.- SujataDey, trade campaigner for The Council of Canadians

In a news conference Monday, Global Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland highlighted the breakthrough on fees for Canadian oil. She also announced that the "proportionality" clause of the NAFTA agreement had been eliminated.

Under that NAFTA rule, Canada must continue to export the same proportion of oil (and natural gas and electricity) as it has in the past three years. The rule was geared toward ensuring the U.S. had access to Canadian energy in times of shortages.

Schultz said the rule was never invoked, nor was it seen as a problem in the oilpatch.

Carlo Dade, director of the trade andinvestment centre of the Canada West Foundation, said it's clear the Americans no longer need the clause as they are muchless reliant on imports.

But The Council of Canadians, which had opposed the clause since NAFTA's inceptionand lobbiedfor its removal, said the omission of sucha rule from the new deal was a "victory" for the organization.

"With the original NAFTA agreement, we were very worried that it would take away our energy sovereignty," saidSujataDey, trade campaigner for The Council of Canadians.

The councilwasconcerned, she said,a continuation of the "proportionality"clause would make it difficult for Canada to meet its climate commitments in the future.