Calgary's brash brand of NIMBYism and why we pay so much attention to it

Some fear immigrants. Somefear poor people. Some fear trees.

They're known,pejoratively, as NIMBYs(an acronym for not-in-my-backyard!) and they'vebeen on full display in Calgary lately.

Local headlines have routinely reflected a relatively small number of residents' unabashed opposition to projects in their neighbourhoods.

Their views are often proclaimed loudly and publicly, no matter how self-serving the opinions may appear to outsiders.

• Rosedale affordable housing plan elicits 'soul-destroying' public opposition
• Southwood resident 'not really sorry' for anti-immigrant letters dismissed by council as 'bigotry'
• Brentwood residents angry that city is trying to plant trees in local park

NIMBYismis by no means unique to Calgarybut there's a particular "brashness" to the sentiment in this city,says JessicaBarrett, a journalist who's covered urban issues whilelivingboth here and inVancouver.

"The thing that strikes me in Calgary is how there's no shame in people being just straight-up classist," she said.

"In Vancouver, maybe it's our west-coast liberal guilt, but people like to dress up NIMBYism as like, 'We're protecting neighbourhood character and heritage.' ... It's dressed up as more of a social-justice thing, in a weird way."

But in Calgary,itseems the desire to halt change outweighs anyfear of publicridicule.

And there's been plenty of ridicule.

Sarcasm, mockery, condemnation

Calgary is a rapidly changing city, and change can bedifficult.

But these days,if you have concerns about something that's about to shake upyour neighbourhood, it takes some daringto speak out.

Those who oppose aprojectcan expect to run into strongopposition, themselves.

Rightly or wrongly,Calgarianshave been mercilessly mocked fortrying to blocka long and growing list of recent projects, including aspecial-needs school,bus rapid transit,secondary suites owned by immigrants,affordable housing unitsandadditional trees in a park.

The outrage over allegedNIMBYismboilshottest on social media, but has bubbled up through more traditional means, too.

The city's transportation manager, in a CBC Radio interview, sarcastically comparedsafety concerns surrounding a dedicated bus lane to worries about meteor strikes or Godzilla attacks.

City councillorsvariously described constituents' class-based commentsin opposition to a small subsidized housing project as "insane bigotry" and "soul-destroying."

The mayoreven took the unusual stepof cancellingpublic engagement sessions in response to what he described as threats against city staff from citizens opposed to a transit-expansion plan.

But is NIMBYism any more prevalent in Calgary than in other major centres? And is it getting worse?

University of Calgary professorFrancisco Uribe doesn't think so.

Fewer NIMBYs, but louder voices

Uribehelps run the university'sUrban Lab, whichworks directly with community associations on design, planning and development issues.

That workincludes organizing public engagement events and hearing directly from citizens who are upset by particular proposals, but Uribe says after 12 years he's seen no growth in the number of people who are staunchly opposed to change,regardless of the bigger picture.

"There haspretty much always been a few citizens out there that have had that position," he said.

If he had to ballpark a number, Uribefigures it's about five per cent of city residentswho are the truest NIMBYs, opposed to virtually everything and unwilling to listen to other points of view.

But he said Calgarians, as a whole,actually seem increasingly well informed and willing to compromise when it comes to proposed projects in their communities that they may not like, initially.

It's something he credits, in part, to a growing number of young people and new arrivals who are well aware that living in a city of more than a million people will come with some degree conflict, but believe it's nothing that can't be sorted out with reasonable discussion.

'Echo chamber'

If there's been any change in NIMBY ranks, Uribe thinks they're actually slightlysmaller, proportionally, than they were in the past.

But one big difference he's noticed is in the coverage they get.

"It appears that the media is paying closer attention or giving a louder voice to the same amount of people," he said.

"SoI'm not so sure we're seeing moreNIMBYismor we're just paying it too much attention."

As a journalist, Barrettsees truthin that assessment.

She notedstories about NIMBYism tend to generate strongreactions, which drivesreporters and editors to cover the topic more often.

"It becomes an echo chamber," she said.

It also makesfor an easy story when vocal opponents hold a rally or patientlywait at city council for hours days, sometimes to voice their opposition.

"For journalists, sometimes, it's a bit of the low-hanging fruit," Barrett said.

"We have conflict, so we have the story, and maybe we do focus on it a bit more.And it's harder for us, as journalists, to source out the people who disagree because they're not as organized, they're not sitting there at council."

Why so angry?

For many Calgarians, one of the more confusing aspects of the localNIMBY flavouris why some people get so upsetover what seem, on the surface, like relatively benign changes in their communities.

But securities analystHilliard Macbeth says there's a simple answer money.

Given how all-in many homeowners are on real estate, Macbeth said it'sunderstandable howhighly sensitive some are to the slightest perceived threat to theirpropertyvalues, particularly baby boomers on the verge of retirement.

"It really is a big part of most people's investment portfolios," he said.

"People really have very little savings outside of their homes."

Indeed, recent opponents to the city's plan to build 16 affordable housing units in the relatively well off community of Rosedale specifically cited fears that the introductionof lower-cost housing would crack theirnest eggs.

"We realise that you may think that we have a 'Not in my backyard' point of view, but that is not the case," one couple wrote to city officials in an email, as part of thepublic-engagement process.

"We are extremely open-minded and welcoming people, but we are close to retirement and the potential impact on our investment at this stage in our lives is most concerning we are most sympathetic to those in need, but this sympathy should not preclude us from protecting our investment."

Another resident wrote:"Affordable housing in this community will lower property values. Big impact to my retirement."

And yet another: "We are in our mid-fifties and heading towards retirement in a couple of years.If this effects (sic) the value of our home, that drastically changes our retirement plans."

While he's careful not to paint all NIMBYs as baby boomers or vice-versa, Uribesaid it can be difficult for older people who bought their homes in 1970s or 1980s Calgary to reconcile just how different the city is in the 2010s.

"Many in the older generations, I think, they see this and understand this and have come around," he said.

"But there are some that are still entrenched in the old ideals that nobody parks in front of my house and I can drive anywhere and I don't want to see any higher densities around me."

Misapplication of the NIMBY label

Janice Paskey, a professor of journalism at Calgary's Mount Royal University, said it's toughto findhard data showing any growth in the coverage of NIMBYism, but she believes the term is overused, as it is.

"I just am really cautious to label people in that way, when really I think we should be listening to what they have to say," she said.

Calling opponentsNIMBYs has become a shorthand way to dismiss them,she said, whether or not theyhave legitimate concerns that have a valid place in the public discourse.

Most homeowners are "deeply attached to their homes and their neighbourhoods," Paskeyadded, andthe fact that people arepassionate about issues affecting their own communities shouldn't come as a surprise, nor should it be trivialized when they are facing financial loss.

"When people are going to take a hit to their home or a perceived hit to their home, that's a legitimate concern,"she said.

"Do we beat up on people because they actually might be losing money?"

'It's not actually rational'

Barrettagreed property values are a "real concern"but said city planning decisions can't be made to protect the undiversified portfolios of certain citizens.

"It's problematic when individual investments start driving the show, when we're catering to those people who are concerned about their retirement," she said.

"It's unfortunate but that's not what the municipal government is there to do. That's more of a social policy from anational standpoint issue that's playing outlike so many things do in our cities."

All that said, Barrett believesthe often-articulated concerns over house prices and retirement plans mask a more fundamental driver of NIMBY behaviour.

"It's an emotional thing for people. It's not actually rational," she said.

"Peopledress it up in terms of investments and property values, but what it comes down to is:'I like my life. I'm happy here. I'mcomfy here. I've always lived here. I've always lived this way. And what you're threatening is my way of life and my identity.'And that is a sure-fire way to get people's backs up."

Raised hackles don't help, Uribe said, in resolvingconflicts that inevitably arise when a million or more people try to live side-by-side, nor do they help build a great city.If there's to be detente, there must be dialogueand that means not blindly slapping the NIMBY label on anyonewho disagrees with you.

"We have to be very careful not to put everybody into that bucket, just because they oppose a project," Uribesaid.

"They might have very good reasons. The project could be terrible, and then everybody should be opposing it."

Calgary at a Crossroads is CBC Calgary's special focus on life in our city during the downturn. A look at Calgary's culture, identity and what it means to be Calgarian. Read more stories from the series atCalgary at a Crossroads.