Alberta's chief judge will examine case of jailed sexual assault victim

Alberta's chief provincial court judge said he will lookinto the case of an Edmonton sexual assault victim locked up while testifying against her attacker.

"I will be conducting a detailed examination of all of the circumstances of this case to determine what, if any, lessons we as a court can learn," Judge TerryMatchettsaid in a statement.

• 'I'm the victim and I'm in shackles': Edmonton woman jailed while testifying against her attacker
• Question of race in sex assault victim's jailing 'keeps me up at night,' Alberta justice minister says

His comments came the same day Justice Minister Kathleen Ganley appointed Manitoba criminal lawyer Roberta Campbell to conduct an independent investigation of Angela Cardinal's case and assigned a committee to make policy recommendations about placing victims or witnesses in custody.

In June 2014, Cardinal a pseudonym the CBC has givenher in light of a publication ban wassavagely attacked, stabbed and sexually assaulted by notorious sexual predatorLance Blanchard.

One year later, onthe first day of a preliminary hearinginto the case, Cardinal kept falling asleep and had trouble focusing and answering questions.

Crown prosecutor PatriciaInnesasked that Cardinal be placed in custody under Section 545(1) of the Criminal Code, which permits a judge to imprison a witness who refuses to co-operate during a preliminary inquiry.

Court transcripts show defence lawyer DianaGoldie, assigned to the case by legal aid, agreed to Cardinal's incarceration. Provincial court JudgeRaymondBodnarekgranted the request.

While testifying, Cardinal spent five nights at the Edmonton Remand Centre, even sharing a van with Blanchard on trips between the facility and the courthouse on at least two occasions.

She was brought into the courtroom in shackles. During court breaks, she was placed in a cell near her attacker.

Seven months after her ordeal with the justice system, Cardinal died in an unrelated shooting.

Matchettsaid he has no authority to review decisions made by judges during trials or preliminary hearings, including a decision to jail a witness.

"It is only in a situation where it is alleged that a judge has misbehaved ormisconductedhimself or herself in some way that the chief judge or the judicial council can review the matter and, in an appropriate case, impose sanctions," he said.

Matchettsaid he has not received any complaints about the Cardinal case to date.

'Important that [she] be named'

Cardinal's mother hopes any review will consider lifting the publication ban on her daughter's name.

"I believe it's important that [she] be named so that she is not simply another statistic," her mother wrote in an affidavit this spring that asked the court to release her 28-year-old daughter's name.

"I want people to understand what happened to her and to hear her story. I believe that this is what she would have wanted as well. [She] was very proud and could stand up for herself. She was a strong person. She should have a voice."

Despite her death and the affidavit written by her mother, the Crownhas refused to ask the court to lift the publication ban on Cardinal's name.

CBC askedCrown prosecutor PatriciaInnesrecentlyif she would have done anything differently in the case, knowing what she knows now.

"No," she said.

Innes and Goldie declined interview requests.