Deaths and deceit: Churchill rail line has long track record of controversy

The ongoing turmoil surrounding the Hudson Bay rail line to Churchill somehow doesn't seem surprising, considering the troubled track's history is rooted incontroversy.

"It was built through really tough terrain and in a tough time in our history, a time when workers' rights really didn't exist," saidKevinRebeck, president of the Manitoba Federation of Labour.

"A number of workers died and many hadseriousinjuries as health and safety was not a priority. In fact, one mile of that track had 50 grave sites along the edge of it, of workers who had diedwhile building that line."

Author Doug Smith, who has written extensively about labour history, described the story ofHudson Bay Railway construction as "one of incredible endurance, hardship and exploitation."

The construction of the rail lineoverlapped with the Winnipeg General Strike, which saw those labourfrustrationsboil over in 1919. Some 30,000 workers walked away from their jobs for six weeks, nearly paralyzing the city as they demanded fair wages, better working hours and union recognition.

It was a time in history when Winnipeg's economy was booming and its population was exploding with immigrants looking for work, so companies held all the power.

In his book,Let us Rise! An Illustrated History of the Manitoba Labour Movement, Smith says the contractors in charge of the construction consistently ignored thefew safety regulations requested by the government.

"Hundreds of miles north of any government inspectors, [the contractors] felt free to force their largely immigrant workforce tolabour in the most unsafe conditions."

There were men who had their arms or legs crushed while another, who was less injured than that, was told by a medic in the work camp to rest for a day or two. But when the foreman heard that, he roared that it was no hospital and ordered the worker to go back to Winnipeg, according to Smith.

"It certainly was indicative of where society was at and how workers were frustrated, whether it was them working on the rail line or in Winnipeg," said Rebeck.

"There wasn't a lot of respect or fairness in wages, in treatment, in having a voice. If you didn't like the way something was happening, 'toobad' was the attitude of employers back then."

Idea planted by farmers

The idea for a rail line to Churchill was sparked in the late1890sby Prairie farmers who believed the Canadian Pacific Railway, running east-west across Canada, was using its monopoly to impose high shipping fees to get their grains to market.

Theypushed for an alternative and viewed Hudson Bay as a possible sea port. After dogged lobbying, the federal government agreed to build the Hudson Bay Railway, stretching800 kilometres from The Pas to Churchill.

Work started in 1906 but was interrupted during the war years, 1914-18, and then by the economic downturn that followed the First World War.

It wasn't until 1927 that the Canadian governmentresumed the project and put somewhat of a rush on it.

Workers were lured to the camp under false claims that they would be well taken care of with food and lodging.But rooms that were made to hold 17 peoplewere packed with 40 or more, Rebeck said.

The men were offered work at 20-30 cents an hour but not told ahead of time that they had to pay $1 per day for room and board and for the transportation to the camp.

"It was not uncommon for men to work 16-hour days, seven days a week for six months at back-breaking pick-and-shovel work only to be told in the end that they owed the contractor $100," Smith wrote.

The ads to attract workers to the camps also trumpeted an unrestricted supply of fresh meat, fresh vegetables, butter, eggs, milk, bread and fruit.

There was no fresh meat or vegetables "or any of the food they were promised,"Rebecksaid.

For the most part, meals were salt pork, beans and biscuits.

'Roughest in Manitoba'

In order to keep the workers from banding together or even unionizing, the contractors played them off against each other to divide them,encouraging racism and discrimination, Rebeck said.

"It was a key part of making sure to keeplabour costs low," he said.

Without much energy restored from the poor food, the workers endured either bitter cold or intense heat depending on the season, as well as mosquitoes and blackflies.

"Some of the men would be bitten so badly that their eyes became infected [and]eventually they had to be hospitalized," states an account by Leonard Earl, a Winnipeg Tribune reporter at the time, whose writings are held by theArchives of Manitoba.

They dug and pickedand hauledwheelbarrows of rock to build the rail bed,lay the track and construct bridges.

And they toiled across "terrain [that] was the roughest in Manitoba," Smith wrote.

According to the Manitoba Historical Society, "there were hundreds of miles of muskeg capable of swallowing large sections of roadbed and track, as well as areas of shifting permafrost, to be crossed."

Then there were the outcrops of Canadian Shield that needed to be blasted away.

"The speed of getting this done was what was being driven and pushed. Health andsafety was not a priority," Rebeck said.

"The contractor was looking to get a job done and didn't care what price was paid in workers' lives."

The last spike was driven on April 3,1929, at Churchill. It was another two years until theport facilities were completed and the rail line was officially declared open.

By that time, 150 workers had died from explosions and hundreds more from other causes, according to reports from the time, though no concrete number of fatalities is known.

'Fight is always ongoing'

While it was originally built to transport grain, the Hudson Bay Railway trackevolved into a lifeline that broughtsupplies and goods to northernManitobansand tourists to see polar bears, belugawhales and the northern lights.

It became an important linkage in the province but one that not many people know the history behind, Rebeck said.

"We've come a long way [in terms of labour rights]but the fight is always ongoing," he said.

"Wenow have decent health and safety regulations but they are always at risk. There are those trying to say those regulations are red tape that make a job more expensive and that they can do it faster and cheaper if they toss that aside."

And westill have companies that don't live up to their agreements, leaving people in sometimes desperate situations,Rebeck said, citing the current owners of the Hudson Bay line, Denver-based Omnitrax.

"Theysigned a deal saying they would repair and maintain the track but have let it deteriorate and are now trying to get out of it."

Omnitrax, for its part, has argued itcannot afford therepairs, estimated to cost between $40 million and $60 million, after the 2017 flood that washed out the rail line. Omnitraxhas argued that flood was a "forcemajeure" eventan exceptional circumstance that curtails the firm's contractual obligations.

The Denver-based companybought the Hudson Bay linein 1997. It had become a branch line of thefederally owned Canadian National Railway system some years earlier but was sold off when the government privatized CN in 1995.

When Omnitraxbought it,along with the port of Churchill, the companyrevivedthe Hudson Bay Railway name.

But the line has been unusable since May 2017, when it was heavily damaged in severe flooding. Since then, there have been squabbles over who is responsible for repairs with owner Denver-based owner Omnitrax rejectingdemands from the federal government to fix it.

Instead, Omnitraxhas attempted to sell the line, with a number of suitors surfacing and then some walking away, all the while residents in Churchill have suffered economically.

Prices of goods have soared to cover the expense of flying them in, while tourismand the related income has plummeted in the town of 900, located 1,000 kilometres north of Winnipeg.

Last week, the Canadian Transportation Agency ruledOmnitrax should have taken reasonable steps to repair the line by November 2017the timeline first proposedby the engineering company,AECOM, that Omnitraxhired to assess the flood damage.

The federal regulator hasordered Omnitrax to begin repairs by July 3 andfile monthly progress reports beginning in August until the work is complete.

Omnitraxhas signaled its intention to appealthe federalorder. Thatappeal will be heard by a federal court, which could order the company to fix the line and pay financial damages to Churchill.

However, all of it could be a moot point.

Atentative deal isin the works to sell the line and the porttotwo groups representing northern communities and First Nations One North and Missinippi Rail LP, operating together asMissinippi Rail Partners along with Fairfax Financial Holdings and AGT Food and Ingredients.

There are still a number of legal issues that must be resolved before the sale which would leave the new owners with the responsibility for repairs is finalized.

After that, a timeline on when work crews can get on the rail tracks and do repairs will be set.