Premier calls OmniTrax closure of Churchill port a 'leverage tactic'

Premier Brian PallisterclaimsOmniTraxshuttered the Port of Churchillin an effort topry more cash out of the province for its port and the Hudson Bay Railway.

In his first publiccomments about OmniTrax's closure of Canada's only rail-accessible deepwater Arctic port, Manitoba's premier said the Denver-based company is trying to leverage money out of the province on the backs of ordinary workers.

• Port of Churchill layoffs 'came out of nowhere,' says town's mayor
• ANALYSIS:What the closure of an Arctic seaport in Manitoba could mean for Canadian sovereignty

Pallister said GregSelinger's NDP government signed a one-year subsidy deal in 2015 that saw OmniTraxreceive $800,000 to $1 million that year.

He said the closure of the port this year is an effort to acquire another deal but vowed not to agree to any more of what he described as corporate bailout packages.

"The agreement that the provinceentered into last year was nothing more but a subsidy bailout done as a consequence of a threat, and now that threat is being repeated this year. And I want to be very, very clear that I don't respond ever to threats," Pallistertold reporters at the Manitoba Legislature on Thursday.

"It would appear that there is a certain amount of leveraging going on here, which is unfortunate and I find it disappointing. Levering on the fears and hopes and the security of Manitobans is never something that I would support. and doing it to obtain a better business deal is not the way that we're going to be engaging with corporations, now or in the future."

Pallister said he could not say more about the 2015 subsidy deal due to a non-disclosure agreement signed by the Selinger government, and he condemned his predecessors for cutting what he described as a secret deal with a U.S. corporation. At one point during his news conference, he conferred in whispers with OliviaBaldwin-Valainis, his communications director.

The premier said OmniTraxsent a letter expressing an interest in a 2016 subsidy deal. The premier saidhe would only accepta plan to make the Port of Churchill sustainable in the long-term.

He nonethelessdeclined to say what such an arrangement would entail, other than that it would involve Ottawa.

• Port of Churchill needs Trudeau government takeover, MP says

"I want to be very clear that we will do this based on principles that we believeManitobanssubscribe to. Unprincipled approaches that rely on bailouts rather than building are not what we will pursue," he said."We will not subscribe to actions based on panic or leverage with no view to long-term sustainable solutions."

Pallisterdeclined to comment on the holdup in a proposed sale of the port and railway to a group of northern Manitoba First Nations, describing that deal as just one of several proposals before OmniTrax.

The premier did hint, however, at short-term help for laid-off workers in Churchill.

"I think all of us are concerned about the folks of Churchill who have received layoff notices. We're also concerned about the ability of families not just in Churchill but in the north along the rail line to be able to receive services and transportation access," he said, adding at least one Tory cabinet ministerwill visit Churchill next week.

Pallister also declined to say whether he believes OmniTraxhas lived up to its commitments to make improvements to the port and railway, which trade experts describe as out-of-date, inefficient and unprofitable.

Earlier this week, Tory MP Gerry Ritz, the former agriculture minister in the Harper government, accused OmniTraxof leaving subsidies on the table.

• What the closure of an Arctic seaport in Manitoba could mean for Canadian sovereignty
• Freight service to Churchill slashed in half

Pallister said he won't vilify the company, aside from its tactics.