Former Winnipeg CAO Sheegl appeals bribery judgment, lawyer alleges judge made 3 errors

Phil Sheegl's lawyer says his clientmade a poor decision to accept $327,200 while acting as Winnipeg's chief administrative officer, but argues a judge erred in deciding he took a bribe.

Lawyer Robert Tapper appeared in front of a panel of three Manitoba Court of Appeal judges Tuesday morning on behalf of Sheegl, andSheegl's two companiesFSS and 2686814 Manitoba Ltd.

Tappersaid Manitoba Court of Kings Bench Chief Justice Glenn Joyalmade three critical mistakes in his March 12, 2022, summary judgmentwhen he found Sheegl took a bribe and should pay the money back to thecity.

The details of the case dateback to 2011 when Winnipeg contractorArmik Babakhanians, the owner of Caspian Projects Inc. and Caspian Construction, was awarded a multi-million dollar contract with the city to build the Winnipeg Police Service's headquarters building.

In May of 2011,Babakhaniansgave Sheegl a $200,000cheque and wrote it was for consulting services,which Sheegl split withthen-mayor Sam Katz and called it a loan.Then in August 2012, Babakhanians paid Katz $127,200 US, which Katz split with Sheegl.

The city sued Sheegl, and in March 2022Joyalfound the former CAO took a bribe when he accepted the money from Babakhanians and didn't disclose it to his employer. Joyal order Sheegl and his two companies to pay back the moneyand his severance package,as well as damages, for a total of about $1.1million.

Tapper argues hearsay

Tappertold the appeal court judges that Joyal's first mistake was that he relied solely on hearsay evidence given through the affidavits of current Winnipeg CAO Michael Jack.He also argued thatthe city didn't provide any evidence from civicemployees who sat on committees and were involved in the decision-making process to construct the police headquartersbuilding.

Tapper doesn't dispute that Sheegl breached his fiduciary duty to the city, but maintains he didn't take a bribe.

"What got lost in this case was the fact that the alleged bribe did not occur in darkness, in currency of a brown paper bag,"said Tapper.

"Whether it was in a paper bag or in a Swiss bank, doesn't really matter, he had no right to get the $327,000," responded Manitoba Court of AppealJustice Chris Mainella.

Tapper agreed it was a poor decision on his client's part, but says the money was part of an Arizona land deal Sheegl and Katz did with Babakhanians.

Land deal questions

Tapper said Joyal's second error was that the chiefjusticewouldn't let him cross-examine an RCMP officer who travelled to Arizona to investigate the land deal claims. Tapper says Sgt. Breanne Chanel had written in an affidavit to the court during a criminal investigation into the police headquartersprojectthat there wasn't enough evidence to prove or deny the existence of aland deal.

City lawyer Michael Finlayson told the courtthere was no land deal and that the entire thing was made up in 2017 in response to questions from the CBC about the exchange of money.

In 2017, CBC News got a copy of search warrantsand production orders that the RCMPgot during a five-year investigation into allegations of fraud and forgery in the police headquartersproject. That case concluded in 2019 with no charges laid.

In the documents obtained by CBC,Mounties alleged Sheegl took a bribe and split it with Katz during the police headquartersconstruction project. CBCasked Tapper, who represents both Sheegl and Katz, about those allegations and Tappersaid the money was part of a land deal.

Tapper showedCBC reporters a handwritten document detailing the transaction. That document was only signed by Sheegl, but Tapper provided a copy of the document featuring Babakhanians signaturelater.

"If you keep your paper[work] and you're asked for a copy of the so-called agreement, why don'tyou producethe one that's signed by both? If you keep your paper, where are the tax stuff, all the things that you would expect. The emails. The text was the only document ever produced by Sheegl," said Finlayson.

He said out of 247 emailssubmitted to the court in this case,only two are from Sheegl, and the two are from 2018.

Finlayson saidadditionally, the other investors in the Arizona land had no idea Sheegl and Katz had supposedly sold part of their interest to Babakhanians until they heard it in the media in 2017even though Finlayson said they were good friends and would golf together at Glendale Golf and Country Club in Winnipeg.

"You run into the guy and you don't mention 'Hey by the way, you know that investment you bought in Tartesso, I sold, Sam and I sold a bit of our share to Armik[Babakhanians] just so you know.It doesn't come up? Come on," said Finlayson.

On top of that,Finlayson said when Sheegl and Katz boughtthe Arizona land in 2005, it cost them about $47,000 an acre.Land prices plummeted after the 2008 economic collapse in the US, and still Finlayson said Sheegl wanted the City to believe that Babakhanianspaid $327,200 for a fraction of land in 2011.

"It's a ridiculous argument. I'm sorry," said Finlayson.

Tapper says perhaps the most serious errorof Joyal's was that he made findings against three individuals who weren't partyto thesummary judgment caselikeArmik Babakhanians,who Joyal determined paid Sheegl a bribe but who wasn't in court to answer to the allegation.

"You can't have that," said Tapper.

"It was incumbent upon the City if they were going to raise the issue of illegal activity ... they had to be before the court," he said.

The panel of judges reserved their decision and will deliver it in writing at a future date.