'People did not stay in their lanes': ex-RCMP investigator reflects on python case

In a 36-year career in theRCMPspent mostly as a criminal investigator with 15 years heading the major crime unit in southeast New Brunswick GerryBelliveauhad never been overruled by a superior when it came to charging or not charging a suspect.

Then came his final assignment.

With a mere three weeks to go before his retirementin March 2014,Belliveau, who was then the acting superintendent for southeast New Brunswick, was asked by top-ranking officers at J Division headquarters in Fredericton if he would review the findings of the investigation into the August 2013 deaths of two young brothers inCampbelltonwho were asphyxiated by a snake.

The initial investigation by the major crime unit in northern New Brunswick had concluded a charge of criminal negligence causing death was not warranted against Jean-Claude Savoie, owner of the African rock python. Officers from H Division in Nova Scotia who reviewed the case agreed.

Despite his looming retirement, Belliveaulocked himself into a motel room in Bathurstfor a week, with two boxes of investigative files, and reviewed the findings in the case.

• Jean-Claude Savoie found not guilty in python deaths of 2 boys
• Python deaths trial: 6 key pieces of background

To keep an open mind, he never looked at the H Division review, but he cameto the same conclusion: a charge of criminal negligence causing the deaths ofConnorBarthe, 6, and NoahBarthe, 4, "just wasn't there," saidBelliveau.

The boys were on asleepoveratSavoie'sapartment when the 3.8-metre-long snake escaped through a small ventilation duct at the top of itsexclosure. The snakethen fell through the ceiling tiles in the adjoining room where the boys were sleeping andkilled them by constriction.

Belliveauremains adamant there was nothing to show thatSavoieshowed reckless disregard for the safety of others or that his actions were a marked departure from what other people would do in the same situation. Hence, no criminal offence occurred.

Belliveau submitted his report at 10 p.m. on a Friday. On Monday, Roger Brown, the assistant commissioner who headed J Division, told him Commissioner Bob Paulson was going to be briefed on the file.

Belliveau was asked if he stood by his report and was prepared to speak about it to Paulson.

"Absolutely," said Belliveau.

He never spoke to Paulson but the morning after the commissioner was briefed,Belliveau got an email from the original investigator, saying the case was being forwarded to the Crown to pursue a criminal charge against Savoie.

Surprising move

"I was stunned," said Belliveau, 60, who is now retired. "People did not stay in their lanes.

"If threepeoplesaythatthe colour is red and you've gotone person that says the colour is white, maybe the three people that said the colour was red wereon the right track."

While the Crown officially approvescharges in New Brunswick, if the RCMPdidn't want a charge laid, the case would not have gone to the Crown, he said. You need evidence for a charge.

By taking the monkey off our back and giving it to somebody else, it's not the solution.- Gerry Belliveau, retired RCMP inspector

"All I can suggest to you today is that we, theRCMP I'm retired now, but theRCMPat that time took the monkey off their back and gave it to the Crown.

"In my opinion, it was a no-win situation and the results speak for themselves."

Savoie was found not guilty of criminal negligence causing death in a jury trial in Campbelltonlast fall.

Belliveau said Supt. Dan Nowlan, who headed the RCMP in northeast New Brunswick "did not accept the decisions or the investigative results of a major crime unit, the Halifax division or Belliveau.

"And with all fairness, with all due respect to the commissioner of the RCMP who is still the commissioner today, what was his background and what was his knowledge of this investigation?...How does a member's reasonable and probable grounds change from a Friday to a Monday and who read the file of the two boxes of information to come up with that decision?""

• RCMP boss briefed about python deaths hours before decision about charge changed
• 'It just defies logic': lawyer in python case says RCMP passed buck to courts

Belliveau said that in the RCMP, as in any organization, people are responsible for certain jobs. Here, some peoplegot involved where they shouldn't have.

'People don't mind their own business'

Belliveaudoesn't begrudge superiors theirauthorityto make decisions, and said they might be looking at things from a different angle. But they should still be accountable.

"Regardless of who makes decisions or who changes decisions from lower, they still need to wear and carry the responsibility that comes with it."

Paulson did not reply to an interview request. Nowlan declined an interview through RCMP spokesperson Paul Greene.

"On the matter itself, the RCMP's response is the same as it has been previously," Greene said in an email to CBC News."The RCMP gathered evidence and presented it to the Crown recommending charges. Charges were then laid and the case went to court. We respect the judge and jury's decision."

'You can't invent the answers'

Belliveau said he understands the "passion" of Nowlan, and perhaps others, in wanting to see a charge laid in a high-profile, tragic case.

You can't invent the answers youcan't.- Gerry Belliveau, retired RCMP

"It was highly charged and the public wanted some answers," Belliveau said. "But you can't invent the answers youcan't."

He has"never received the courtesy of a phone call" about why it was ultimately decided to chargeSavoie.

"What changed? And who made that decision? Can he back up the decision? Can he justify the decision? Was anybody pressured?" he said. "Because to this very day, I still don't know why he was charged."

• RCMP's handling of python case challenged by Jean-Claude Savoie's lawyer

Now doing consulting work, Belliveau still goes back to the oath he swore 36 years ago when he became an RCMP officer.

"Seek the truth, only. That's our job."