DNA found on Dennis Oland's bloodstained jacket matches slain father's

Three stains found on the brown sports jacket seized from DennisOland's home tested positive for blood, and the DNA found within those bloodstainsmatched his fatherRichard Oland's DNA profile,the accused's murder trial in Saint Johnheard on Tuesday.

Joy Kearsey, aDNA scientistwho worked for the RCMP's forensic lab in Halifax, analyzed several samples related to the 2011 death of the prominent businessmanand testifiedabout her 1,400 pages of findings, which were reduced into a 52-page report for the jury.

• Live blog:Dennis Oland's second-degree murder trial: Nov. 24
• On mobile? Get live coverage of the trial here

Blood was confirmed in three areas ofthe Hugo Boss jacket seized from Dennis Oland'sbedroom closet a week after his father's bludgeoned body was discoveredthe outside right sleeve, the outside upper left chest,and the outside back, in the centre, near the hem, said Kearsey.

Within all three of those bloodstains, she found single-source DNAprofilesthatmatched Richard Oland's in all nine areas used for comparison.

"The estimated probability of selecting an unrelated individual at random from the CanadianCaucasian population with the same profile is onein 510 billion," Kearsey said under questioning by Crown prosecutor Patrick Wilbur.

The world population is estimated as being between seven and eight billion.

There's no way to say how the blood got on the jacket, or how long it had been there, said Kearsey.

But it is "likely" the DNA extracted from the bloodstained areas came from the blood, she said.

Thebody of RichardOland, 69, was discoveredlying face down in a pool of blood in his Saint John investment firm office on July 7, 2011, with "hundreds" of blood-spatter stains around him.

The multimillionairehad suffered 45 blunt and sharp force injuries to his head, neck and hands.

DennisOland, 47, who was the last known person to see his father alive during a meeting at his Canterbury Street office the night before,has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder and is standing trial before a judge and jury in the Court of Queen's Bench.

Olandtold policeduring avoluntary statementon July 7he was wearing a navy blazer when he visited his father on the night in question, but security video of him earlier that day shows he was wearing a brown jacket.

Maureen Adamson, RichardOland'ssecretary,also testified to seeing the accused in a brown jacket when he arrived at the office.

The jacket was dry cleaned on July 8, after police told Oland thathe was a suspect, the trial has heard.

DNA not necessarily from blood

Defence lawyer Alan Gold, who's known for his expertise in dealing with forensic evidence, arguedthere's no way to say conclusively that the DNA found came fromblood.

He said it's possible the blood was so degraded that the DNA didn't come from it, but rather another source, such as saliva, perspiration or tears.

He even suggested it could be animal blood and the human DNA came from another source,noting DNA can be transferred by touch and some people are "good shedders," who leave behind more DNA than others.

DNA can also "migrate," depending on how an item is packaged, said Gold. The jacket in question was folded up and stored in a paper exhibit bag that measured 30 centimetres by 30 centimetres for about four months, so some parts would have come into contact with other parts, he said.

Kearsey agreed there was no way to say for sure what the source of the DNA was, but maintained it was "morelikely" it came from the blood, based on her experience and knowledge of how the process works.

"I can't put a percentage or anything on it," she said.

There was no indication of any animal DNA, she added.

Goldstressed how small the bloodstains were. The one on the back, for example, measured 0.5 centimetres by 0.5 centimetres and was overlooked the first few times the jacket was examined by at least two people, he said.

The blood "could have been on the jacket for weeks or months," said Gold.

Kearseyagreed there was no way to know the age of the blood, but she said she would expect some would be removed every time the jacket wascleaned, depending on the thoroughness of the laundering or dry cleaning.

3 other stains on cuffs match victim's DNA

Kearseytestified on Monday the two tests used for the identification of blood can produce false negative resultsif "environmental insults" have degraded the hemoglobin. Washing an item, for example, or warm and moist environmentscan create false negatives, she said.

Some of the stains on Dennis Oland's jacket tested negative for blood and did not provide enough genetic material to provide a meaningful DNA profile, the court heard on Tuesday.

A minimum of 0.246nanograms, abillionth of a gram, is required.

Two other stains found on theinside right cuff of the jackettested negative for blood and hada mixedDNA profile, with the major component matching the victim's profilewith a certainty ofone in 180 million, said Kearsey.

Another stain foundon the inside left cuff also tested negative for blood and had a mixed DNA profile. In that case, theminor componentmatched the victim's with a probability of one in 40, she said.

Threehairs found in Richard Oland's left hand during the autopsy, and another hair foundin his right hand were"unsuitable for nuclear DNA analysis." A root with cellular material is required, Kearsey explained.

The trial resumes on Wednesday at 9:30 a.m., when theCrown is expected to call its final witness.

Then the defence is expected to present its case.

The trial, which started on Sept. 16, is scheduled to run until Dec. 18, making it one of the longest criminal trials in New Brunswick history.