'We have to be involved': N.W.T. First Nation says Enbridge not properly consulting on pipeline repair

The Liidlii Kue First Nation says Enbridge Pipelines Inc. is not taking its duty to consult Indigenous groups seriously as it plans to repair a pipeline in the Northwest Territories.

Daniel T'seleie, theco-legal counselfor the Liidlii Kue First Nation (LKFN), spoke for the issue during thethird day of National Energy Board hearings Thursday in Fort Simpson, N.W.T.

Enbridge proposes to replace a 2.5-kilometre section of itsLine 21 pipeline by drilling 100 metresunderneath the Mackenzie River about 10 kilometres from Fort Simpson. The line runs 869 kilometres between Norman Wells, N.W.T., and Zama, Alta.

• Enbridge says fix to N.W.T. pipeline will cost $53M

• Enbridge shuts down Norman Wells pipeline, citing 'stability concerns' along riverbank

That section is being replaced because it currently sits on an unstable river bank. The company saysthose "stability concerns" arewhy it shut the pipeline down in November2016.

The company says the$53-million repair is routine and is not likely to negatively affect the environment or people living in the region, according to documents filed with the National Energy Board.

But T'seleieand Liidlii Kue Chief Gerald Antoine say Enbridgeis not keeping community members informed. They say the companyeither doesn't answerquestions from members of the First Nation, or offers vague responses on issues such as monitoring for leaks in the pipeline.

"We're in a situation where Enbridge is saying:'Trust us, we know best with this information and we've made the best decision for you,'" T'seleie told the National Energy Board's review panel.

"I disagree that Enbridge has that right to make decisions for us, for LKFN or other Dene," he said.

Another issue is decommissioning the old pipeline, T'seleie said. Community members want to know why the old pipe is going to beleft in place. In submissions to the NEB, Enbridge says it will fill the old pipe with concretebut leave it where it is.

The application does not list why the old pipe cannot be completelyremoved.

'We have the intelligence'

Antoine compared the pipeline to a "plumbing issue" in the community'shome in an interview with CBCNews on Friday. As"homeowners," the people living in the region have a right to know exactly what is happening, he said.

"We have to be involved," Antoine said. "We have thousands and thousands of years of information we know about the land."

The First Nation is seeking to be "full partners and equal partners" in the development, with the ability to regularly assess the pipeline's progress, Antoine said.

"We have the intelligence, we have the capacity to be able to work in partnership. We need to be open-minded and they need to work with us."

Duty to consult before Supreme Court

Proper consultation with Indigenous governments on resource projects came up in two cases in the Supreme Court this summer.

In a unanimous decision,Canada's top court ruledthe NEB's consultation process was "significantly flawed" when it allowed a Norwegian company to use sound technology to search for oil near Clyde River, Nunavut.

• Supreme Court quashes seismic testing in Nunavut, but gives green light to Enbridge pipeline

• 'We're concerned': After Supreme Court rulings, duty to consult a hot topic at AFN meeting

In the other decision, regarding a pipeline in southwestern Ontario, the court warned the NEB and energy project proponents that "any decision affecting Aboriginal or treaty rights made on the basis of inadequate consultation will not be in compliance with the duty to consult."

TheLiidliiKue First Nation isn't outright opposed toEnbridge'splan for its Line 21pipeline, it just wants to have more answers from the company and be consulted on the changes,T'seleiesaid.

"They've been doing this drilling work for decades," he said. "That's their traditional knowledge, based on decades of experience, but theDenehave thousands of years of detailed knowledge about this land, these rivers, of the animals and plants."

In documents submitted to the NEB in March, Enbridge says it respects the rights of Indigenous people to be consulted. It laid out theirefforts to do so in its submissions.

The company designed a consultation program that includesmail outs, in-person meetings, and an open house in Fort Simpson in February.

It reiterated that position in a statement to CBC News Friday, and said the company is "committed to working through any concerns noted during the hearing with the interested parties."