'We thought no one would care': Clyde River Inuit flooded with support

For Inuit from Clyde River today's Supreme Court hearing was surreal.

After two years fighting their 'David and Goliath' battle against seismic tests to search for oil and gas deposits offshore of their community, hundreds of protesters in Ottawa and Nunavut, along with celebrities and activists around the world, showed their support.

"I wasn't expecting this," said Jerry Natanine, amidst a crowd of 300 demonstrators."We thought no one would care."

The former mayor of Clyde River has been leading the charge on his community's legal challenge of the National Energy Board's decision to allowseismic testing and it hasn't been easy.

"The last two years we've been through hell," he said.

"We don't want anyone else to face that, because as a community we've had real hard times, stressing about whether our food source is going to be all gone."

If the majority of Canada's nine Supreme Court justices side with the Nunavut community, Natanine could get his wish.

This case could set a precedent that redefines the Crown's duty to consult with Indigenous groups before development projects get the go-ahead.

'The soul of Canada'

NaderHasan, the lawyer representing Inuit inClydeRiver, says projects like seismic testing represent"a threat to their livelihood, food security and 4000-year-old way of life."

Because the potential consequences are so serious, Clyde River says the level of consultation provided was not sufficient.

"This case is really about the soul of Canada," he said.

"Are we going to be a nation that takes Indigenous and Inuit rights seriously? Or are we going to allow Indigenous rights to be reduced to a due diligence checklist for industry proponents to check off?"

• Nunavut seismic testing appeal could help define Canada's duty to consult Indigenous groups
• Clyde River hunters laud 'surprising' Greenpeace partnership over court case

The facts of the case have already been set. At issue is what it takes forCanada to fulfil itsconstitutional duty to consult Indigenous communities.

During today's hearing, Hasan argued the meetings held by the seismic testing companies in four Nunavut communities just weren't enough.

"When they were going up there telling us what they were going to do, it wasn't a consultation," Natanine said. "They just told us what they were going to do and didn't answer our questions."

Threat to marine animals, argues hamlet

The companies would use airguns to produce pulses of sound waves under the waters offshore from a number of Baffin Island communities.

According to aproject overview on the National Energy Board website, the sound created by the airguns"is estimated to be 230decibels at a distance of onemetreaway, and will be repeated every 13 to 15seconds, 24hours a day while operating."

Inuit in Clyde River are concerned the sounds may be loud enough to scare away or deafen the marine mammals they rely on for food a significantworryfora region where food insecurity is "a very serious problem."

In Nunavut, basic food items in grocery stores can cost up to three times higher than in the rest of Canada.

"We believe that it's a danger to our lives because it's going to destroy the ecology and kill off the animals," said Natanine.

• Nunavut hamlet heads to Supreme Court over Arctic seismic testing
• Celebrities, activists rally support for Nunavut hamlet's Supreme Court case

The consortium was granted afive-year approval to use the tests to search for underwater oil and gas deposits in 2014 but has not done any yet.

'Water is sacred'

Dressed in sealskin and shouting 'Ourwater, our food' inInuktitut, about 50 protesters crowdedIqaluit'sbusiest intersection earlier thisafternoon, showing their support for Clyde River.

"Our food source is threatened," saidAletheaArnaquq-Baril, an activist and filmmaker who helped organize theIqaluitprotest.

"We can't be doing things without the consent of the people who are drastically affected, whose food security is affected and economy is affected."

While Clyde River has been leading this fight, Arnaquq-Baril says the effects of the testing wouldbe felt by communities "along all ofBaffin, the entire length of the massive island."

"It's kind of an insane time with the decision on the pipelines yesterday and I hope the country doesn't allow things to continue the way they're going."

• Trudeau cabinet approves Trans Mountain, Line 3 pipelines, rejects Northern Gateway

Supreme Court will issue 'the final word'

In themorning, the Supreme Court heard from another Indigenous community:the Chippewas of the Thames.

The First Nation argued the National Energy Board approved a development project without proper consultation this time a partial reversal of a pipeline carrying heavy crude.

• Enbridge Line 9 pipeline appeal approved by Supreme Court

"Both cases at their core are about the duty to consult and the crown's obligation to respect Indigenous rights, Inuit rights," said Hasan.

"Quite literally, these cases will affect every single development project across the country."

Meanwhile, lawyers for Enbridge Pipelines Inc. argued the National Energy Board used "more than reasonable" efforts to hear about the potential impacts on the rights and interests of Indigenous communities.

The company alsocautioned the court not to impose "unnecessary and impractical" regulations, which would make it challenging for regulators to do their work.

The Supreme Court of Canada will now consider today's arguments. It will likely be several months until a decision is reached.