3rd-party advertiser Horizon Ottawa faces election audit

UPDATE| Doug Thompson hasappealed the decisions of the election compliance audit committee. Horizon Ottawa filed an application to appeal the decision, but later dropped it.

At the committee's meeting on Dec. 8, members appointed external auditors to report onthe campaign finances for Horizon Ottawa and Thompson.

An independent committee has found "reasonable probability"that Horizon Ottawa contravened election financing rules when it promoted a festival attended by candidates before registering as a third-party advertiser.

The decision is potentially precedent setting, coming only a few years after new provincial rules were enacted.

Registered third-party advertisers raise money to promote like-minded candidates or run ads against political foes, but that spending is capped at $25,000.

• What voters should know about 3rd-party advertisers and the Ottawa election
• Think corporate and union donations are banned in the next city election? Think again

"Quite similar to the nomination of a candidate, individual or corporation or trade union must come in, fill out the necessary paper work, and that paperwork must be certified with the city clerk," said John Pappas, the lawyer who spoke on behalf of complainant and prominent local developerEdward Phillips.

"If a person makes a third-party advertisement without being duly registered, that is very, very clearly an offence."

Horizon Ottawa made that error when it created and distributed fliers for its Horizonfest event before registering, Pappas argued, noting that it's only reasonable to suspect the group incurred some expense to design and print them.

Horizon Ottawa is a well-known lobby group that advocatesfor more progressive voices at the council table. The group was one of two registered third-party advertisers during the most recent municipal election.

The election compliance audit committee found the explanation compelling enough to direct city staff to appoint an auditor to look into it.

Once the audit is complete, the committee will evaluate ifany potential violationsshould spark legal proceedings.

No specific breach identified

Sam Hersh, a Horizon Ottawa board member, dipped his head as a committee member began reading its decision,and latertold CBC he'd provide no further comment at this time.

His lawyer, Kyle Morrow, had hoped to see the application for an audit denied out of hand.

"There's no affidavit evidence, no photographic evidence, no witness evidence, no expert evidence from a lawyer or accountant," he said. "It's not even clear what specific provisions of the act the complainant is accusing the respondent of violating."

Committee members acknowledged the point, but said they were using discretion to ensure the questions at issue"are determined in a just manner."

Morrow forcefully argued that the nine-hour festival was not a fundraiser it lost $6,200 but told the committee Horizon Ottawadisclosed information on contributions from the festival in its filing "in the interest of transparency" because there's legal ambiguity surrounding what qualifies as athird-party ad.

Committee chair Timothy Cullen followed up on the point by asking ifHorizonfestwas a third-party advertisement.

"It could potentially be," answered Morrow.

Thecommittee's conclusion that Horizon Ottawacould potentially have contravened finance rules when it posted flyers for the event more than a week before registering its status on August 24, 2022 factored in that definition.

Veteran politicianalso facingaudit

Doug Thompson, who represented the people of Osgoode for three decades, is also facing an audit,after admitting to the committee that he undervaluedreused signs he distributed during hisfailed 2022bid.

The veteran municipal politicianleft retirement so he couldattempt to retake the ward from George Darouze, the councillor he'd previously endorsed, slapping tape over the "re" in "re-elect" on a number of long-stored signs.

On his filing these appeared under what Pappas described as the "suspiciously round number" of $100.

After he was notified of the complaint, Thompson says he realized his team had pulled out more used signs than they originally intended, bringing the actual value closer to $500: "We made an error. It was regrettable, and we apologize."

3rd-party advertiser decries 'fishing expedition'

Horizon Ottawa's lawyer cast doubt on the motives of the complainant, developer Edward Phillips,who has faced public criticism for his own sizeable campaign donations.

"He's advanced rumours, conjecture, and inuendo," said Morrow. "This is nothing more than a fishing expedition to silence and intimidate those who disagree with the complainant politically."

Phillips said little during the meeting and provided no additional comment to CBC.

His third application for an audit, against Capital ward Coun. Shawn Menard, was denied. The committee found the complainant's suspicions that Menard undervalued reused campaign materials to be reasonable, but felt the councillor allayed those concerns in his response.