Nortel's toxic legacy: Cleaning up former sites to cost millions - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 06:45 PM | Calgary | -11.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Ottawa

Nortel's toxic legacy: Cleaning up former sites to cost millions

When Nortel Networks slipped under the dark cloud of bankruptcy protection in January 2009, concerns turned first to the financial catastrophe that would ensue. But the company has left a toxic environmental legacy as well.

Creditors seeking more than $300M to clean up contamination at former Nortel sites across Ontario

Darwin Hoskin holds a photo of the old Nortel Plant in Belleville, Ont., where he worked for 38 years. (CBC)

When Nortel Networks Corp. slipped under a dark cloudof bankruptcy protection in January 2009, concerns turned first to the peoplewho'd lost money former workers, pensioners and investors and the financial catastrophe that would ensue.

But the company also left a legacy of environmental damage in the form of contaminated propertiesacross Ontario, andtaxpayers could end up paying to clean them up.

There are all kinds of contaminants that wereleft.- Mark Mattson, waterkeeper for Lake Ontario

As the bankruptcy settlement process continues, Ontario's Ministry of Environment and Climate Change is seeking more than $100 million for the cleanup of former Nortel sites in Belleville, Brockville, Kingston and London, according to documents produced by the court-appointed monitor for Nortel.

"Predicting remediation risk management costs is difficult," said ministry spokespersonGary Wheeler in an email to CBC. "It may fall upon the Ministry to carry out this work and incur the associated costs."

The Ontario government isn't the only creditor looking to recover money from Nortel's dwindling estate: There arecurrently more than $300 million in claims against the bankrupt company to clean up toxic sites.

Chemicals in soil, groundwater

For years,Nortel'ssprawling manufacturing facilities in Belleville,Brockville, Kingston and London built electrical components used in telephones and circuit boards.
Mark Mattson, an environmental lawyer, says after Nortel plants closed there were 'all kinds of contaminants that were left.' (CBC)

"There are all kinds of contaminants that were left," said Mark Mattson, an environmental lawyer with Waterkeeperfor Lake Ontario. "Vinyl chloride and trichloroethylenes, these are the sort of things left over from degreasing products that they used a great deal at the [Nortel] plants."

Court documents obtained by CBC detail the hazardous substances that were used, including chlorinated solvents, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and trichloroethylene.

Thanks to poor storage and disposal practices, some of these chemicals ended up in the soil and groundwater at the sites.

VOCs are linked to toxic effects on humans, from risks of cancer to neurotoxicity, according to Health Canada. Documents show heavy metals, hydrocarbons, PCBs, hexane, dioxane and other contaminants have also been found at some locations.

When chemicals like these seepinto groundwater, they can migrate and create a toxic plume. That's what happened at the former Nortel plant in Belleville, a developmentthat's troubling Mattson.

"I think it's really concerning that the toxic waste has moved off the Nortel property and under other properties including schools," he said

Toxic air at Belleville school

Our Lady of Fatima Catholic School sits beside the old Nortel manufacturing facility at 250 Sidney St. in Belleville, Ont.

The school gets its drinking water from the municipal water system. Nevertheless, the Algonquin and Lakeshore Catholic District School Board installed eight monitoring wells to testgroundwater nearthe school startingas far back as 2001.

"Oftentimes we're told, like in the Nortel case, there's no risk because the contaminated water is not part of Belleville's drinking water supply," said Mattson. "But that contaminated water is also leaching into air and offing gasses."

In fact, last yearroutine tests did find low-level toxic gasses at the school. The school board said the levels were not dangerous, but they were high enough for board officials to take action.

Last June, the board told parents it had found "some exceedances when measured against the Ministry of Environment's most stringent standards for the volatile organic compound trichloroethylene."

Clearing the air

"When we found out about it, it was a little scary," parent and school council treasurerStaceyOvendenwrote in anemail. "I may be naive but I knew the school board would do what was best. I don't like that there was contamination."

Our Lady of Fatima School in Belleville, Ont., sits above a toxic plume that drifted from the former Nortel factory next door. (CBC)

Working with Nortel's consultants, the boardstruck a plan to install a subslabdepressurization system to exhaust any soil vaporization from beneath the school through the building's roof, said Doug Campbell, controller of plant and planning services at the school board.

That involved moving the school's entire student population to another Belleville school for six months while theventilation system was being installed.

While the Nortel estate footed the bill for some of the work, it still cost the school board $750,000.The board would not say how much of the cost Nortel covered.

The board is still seeking more than $63 million from the Nortel estate, and the toxic plume under the former Belleville site remains.

Contaminated sites across Canada

The former Nortel sites arejust a few of close to 800 polluted propertiesin Ontario with the estimated liability for cleanup pegged at $1.8 billion,according to a recentauditor general's report.

These abandonedbrownfields end up on the province's list when companies walk away or go bankrupt. The federal government has its own list.

Scott Vaughan is president of the International Institute of Sustainable Development and former federal commissioner of the environment. (CBC)

TheFederal Contaminated Sites Inventory details some 24,000 toxic sites,including deserted mines.

"Under Canadian law the polluter is supposed to pay, but if there is no polluter [because] they've gone then taxpayers have to pick up the bill for doing the cleanup," said Scott Vaughan, president of the International Institute for Sustainable Development and former federal commissioner of the environment.

"I wouldn't want my daughter in her school adjacent to a site that actually might be leaching or have contaminants that have a carcinogenic or human health effect," said Vaughan. "Environmental contaminants don't go away and the remediation costs are really expensive."

Toxic legacy

Darwin Hoskin, who spent his career at Nortel Networks in Belleville, would prefer to remember his former employer as a forward-thinking telephone innovator rather than a polluter.

At one pointNortel was the single-biggest employer in Belleville, with about 1,200 people employed at the factory. "It was a really big deal," remembers Hoskin, who spent 38 years working at the plant before being laid off, and who still livesjust down the street from the property.

"Way back when they built this plant there wasn't environmental rules, and we know that all over Ontario," said Hoskin.

Like the school board, the City of Belleville is seeking tens of millions of dollars from the Nortel estate because it owns the Quinte Exhibition Raceway, adjacent to the former Nortel plant.

"The city hasn't paid for any cleanup yet," said Cameron Smith, Belleville'senvironmental projects manager. "It may have to in the future."

The former Nortel property in Belleville, Ont. (CBC)

Ontario creditors seeking money from Nortel's estate for environmental cleanup:

  • Ministry of Environment and Climate Change: $100 million.
  • The City of Belleville: $70 million.
  • Algonquin and Lakeshore Catholic District School Board: $62 million.
  • Sidney StreetProperties Corp., Belleville: $55 million.
  • SCI Brockville Corp.: $28 million.