Day 2 of public meeting sees more opposition to Vanier shelter plan

The council chamber at Ottawa City Hall was full again Wednesday,the second of a three-day meeting to discuss the Salvation Army's controversial proposal to build a 350-bed facility on Montreal Road in Vanier.

At the end of the meeting, more than 170 people had signed up to speak to the issue before the sign-up was cut off at 5 p.m.

It was another day full of personal testimony, and technical discussions over city planning policies.

The morning ended with Jamie Anderson playing the members of the planning committee Beethoven's Ode to Joy on the ukulele.

"I'm a music teacher, I teach in my home studio in Vanier," Anderson told councillors. She said she advertises her studio as being near Beechwood Avenue, closer to tonier New Edinburgh.

"I hate doing that but if I said Vanier, I'd get fewer phone calls," she said.

Chair clears chamber

Anderson said that at a recent meeting, she asked Salvation Army representatives what she should tell her students about the shelter moving in.

"And he smiled and he said, 'Well maybe our clients will want guitar lessons.' I didn't even know how to answer that. Does he have so little regard for his clients that he can joke about them?"

Moreover, Anderson said, the representative's attitude indicated "they have a disregard for the businesses there."

Anderson's emotional public deputation sparked audience applausewhich isn't allowed during standing committee meetings and led chair Jan Harder to clear the gallery for an early lunch.

"I've warned you so many times," Harder said, clearly exasperated by what has been a long and often heated meeting.

Delegationswarned

Councillors spent the first hour of the Wednesday's meeting questioning lawyer Michael Polowin, who'sarguing against the proposal on behalf of two Vanier business owners.

The Salvation Army's proposal hinges on council exempting itfrom city planning policies that forbid emergency shelters on traditional main streetssuch asMontreal Road.

That promptedHarder to warn public delegationsto stick to the narrow planning issue, and not to speak about the activities of the men who would use the facility, the city's housing first policy or how the Salvation Army would fund this project.

But Polowinargued that therules do permit leeway to consider the communityimpact of a land use, which is also a planningissue.

"I'm not here to bash poor people," he said. "What I'm saying is that it is a legitimate concern of this committee to determine for itself if the very presence of this facility, at the size that it is proposed at, could create adverse impacts both by the users of the facility and those that the facility might attract."

Support for proposal

Some delegations spoke in favour of the proposal Wednesday, including theexecutive director of the ByWard Market BIA.

"Let's be real, no matter where this was proposed, there would be hundreds of people opposed," said Jasna Jennings. "And when all is said and done, the doom and gloom never materialized."

Jenningssaid the only issue the BIA has with the Salvation Army's currentlocation on George Street is that men loiter on the sidewalk, but said an internal courtyard in the new proposal shouldsolve that problem.

Julius Bango, a resident of the Salvation Army's life skills program for about three months, also addressed the committee.

"I've been to a lot of programs because of my alcoholism, but none of those programs addressed how to live," he told the committee.

"I encourage the committee not to miss the boat on this one," he said. "There are a lot of people out there that need this kind of help. This new facility is needed ... there arelives out there that actually depend on it. So make the right decision."

Most opposed

Most of the other public delegations spoke against the project, includingTara O'Halloran,who lives in a condo across from the Salvation Army's current location on George Street.

O'Halloran said she doesn't believe the proposal is the best way to help the homeless, and argued that "holistic strategic planning is not done in a vacuum."

One speaker after another expressed skepticism about variousaspects of the proposal.

"We heard from the Salvation Armythat this was the only location for this facility," said Natalie Belovic. "I find this ludicrous."

She wondered why other sites such as LeBretonFlats, BayviewYard, Shoppers City East or the upcoming Gladstone redevelopment were not considered.

Decision on Friday

Harder decided to end the publicdelegation sign-up process at 5 p.m. Wednesday, as some people who missed their turn are adding their names to the bottom of the list.

Officials, including city clerk and solicitor Rick O'Connor, could not remember a committee meeting where so many people came to speak to a single issue.

More than 70 people are still scheduled to speak when the meeting resumes on Friday morning. Committee members plan to stay later until they vote on the project.