NDP and residents want answers on Brandt development in Wascana Park

Both the Saskatchewan NDP and opponents of commercial development in Regina's Wascana Park are demanding answers from the provincial government regarding the still-to-be-approved 77,500 square-footBrandt Developmentsproject, a small portion of which wouldbe devoted to a newCNIBheadquarters.

"I think the entiretyof the Brandt project leaves a lot of questions that haven't been answered. I'm not sure what tax implications there will be or whether Brandt will be paying taxes," NDPMLA for Regina Douglas Park NicoleSarauersaid.

The tax implications of the projectis to be determined, according to the government. Commercial operations in the park are taxable, but certain organizations can apply for tax exemptions. The CNIB's current building is tax exempt because it is a not for profit.

The CNIBwould likely keep its tax exemption within its new building.

"Given that final approval on this project has not been given by the Board and the other occupants remain unknown, the amount of taxation cannot be determined at this time," the government said in a statement.

The PCCAct gives province power over park

Wascana Centre used to be managed by aboard of five members from government, three from the city of Regina and three from the University of Regina.

In March 2017, the government said it wanted a "streamlined approach" toWascanaCentre governance. The Provincial Capital Commission Actestablished a new board structure wherein the province holds three of five seats, allowing it to dictate board decisions.

The board currentlyconsists of Mike Carr, deputy minister of central services, governmentMLAsLaura Ross and WarrenSteinley, Regina city councillor Barbara Young and Dave Button with the University of Regina.

ThePCCAct also strippedthe statutory requirement that $782,000 be transferred from the province's general revenue fund to theWascanaCentre.

A new headquarters forConexusCredit Union was approved by city council in 2016, before the change in governance. The Brandt/CNIBapproval came under the new board structure.

"At that time (prior to 2017)at least everybody had a say and it was transparent and decisions were made in that fashion and we're not seeing that anymore,"Sarauersaid.

Regina resident Jim Gallagher has been a vocal opponent of commercial development in the park. He is part of the informal groupNo Business in the Park.

He said the old composition of the board was "near genius" because "it forced decision making by consensus" and served residents for 50 years and multiple governments.

"It really seems that they have an ulterior motive, an agenda, that being to sell off parts of the park to generate some income," Gallagher said.

Gallagher wondered why the Brandt development was being advertised by commercial real estate firm Colliers Canada even though it has not been completely approved by the PCC board.

The Colliers posting from October saidthe four-storey building could be used for government offices, classes, clinics, offices, retail spaces, gyms and charities.

"How on earth is it that Brandt can go and publicize this thing and advertise it [when]the PCChasn't approved it?" Gallagher said.

The floor-to-ceiling glass building will feature bike parking, showers, a rooftop patio, a green space courtyard, 110 parking stalls 60 of which will be underground and two elevators.

PCCmeetings private, annual report not made public

Gallagherand Sarauersaid the project as described does not fit the purpose of WascanaCentre's master plan, in terms of both size and who may occupy it. WascanaCentre's stated purpose says it is devoted to:

• Development of the seat of government.
• Enlargement of educational opportunities.
• Advancement of cultural arts.
• improvement of recreational facilities.
• Conservation of the environment.

The new government-controlled PCCboard approved the Brandt project in September 2017. Brandt nowhas to submit detailed plans to thePCC Architectural Advisory Committee, after which the board will vote on a final approval.

The board meets roughly five times a year. Its meetings are not public and it does not produce an annual report that is publicly available.

Minister defends process, project

Last week. the minister responsible for the PCCdefended its structure and its decision to approve the Brandt project.

"We're listening very closely to the public. I'm hearing people come forward on both sides of the issue," Ken Cheveldayoffsaid.

Last week, Cheveldayoffcited Brandt's philanthropy as another reason to justify its project in the park.

In August, opponents of commercial development spoke in front of city council. Councillors voted unanimouslyto restrict future commercial development at Wascana, despite not having voting control on the board.

Cheveldayoffsaid it is Regina citycouncillorsthat should be called outon their position, given the previous approval of the Conexusbuilding.

"I think you should be asking those citycouncillorswhy they changed their mind. They voted unanimously one way and later on did a 180 on it. If I did that in the house I would be called to task."

Gallagher said the unanimous vote against development should have been a message to the province that it was unpopular.

"If you are actually here to serve the people, the people have spoken pretty clearly. What do you think would happen if the provincial government sponsored a plebiscite in the city of Regina on this issue?"

In 1987, a group formed opposing a plan to build the Mackenzie Art Gallerynext to the Saskatchewan Museum of Natural History. The group managed to force a plebiscite and the plan was struck down by voters. The gallery was placed inside the T.C. Douglas Building instead.