Sask. considering small nuclear reactors to lower carbon emissions

Saskatchewan may look to small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) in the future as part of its goals to lower carbon emissions.

Premier Scott Moe said the provincial government has been in discussion with Ontario and New Brunswick about small modular nuclear reactor technology.

NDP Leader Ryan Meili expressed concerns about whether the technology isready.

"We haven't seen those rolled out in a commercial way that's actually producing power in any other jurisdiction, so we need to make sure that that's actually possible," Meili said on Thursday.

Meili said a potential obstacle is that SMRs would require activated uranium, which Sask. would have to import from elsewhere.

Saskatchewan's goal is to lower its emissions to 40 per cent less than 2005 levels within the next 11 years, but its main source of power is still coal.

"That's not sayingwe're moving ahead with [SMRs] but we'd most certainly want to have the conversation around the clean supply of nuclear power here in the province," Moe said.

The Premier said the province will look at cleaner power generation while keeping the assets it already has, such as carbon capture storage (CCS).

"That technology, that innovation continues to advance," Moe said of CCS.

Meili said the government could instead look at readily available, affordable options right now to reduce emissions like wind and solar power. Hesaid that under the NDP's plan, Renew Saskatchewan,investments could be madein solar and wind retrofits forhomes,businesses and farms.

Not only do those alternatives have lower emissions than coal, jobs could be created for theinstallation, maintenance and manufacturing of infrastructure from solar and wind home retrofitting.

Smaller is more convenient, cost effective: engineering dean

Esam Hussein, dean of engineering and applied science at the University of Regina, said the smaller nuclear reactors could be beneficial for smaller jurisdictions because they don't put a big strain on the province's grid.

If a reactor goes down, the grid could still function, he added. A challenge with bigger reactions is the possibly delays for construction time, as well as cost.

Smaller reactors could be built on site and if there is a part that needs to be replaced, the entire system will not need to replaced.

"These reactors are designed to be inherently safe, which means that if something goes wrong, if the reactor heats up, the physics will shut down the reactor automatically," Hussein said.

Some newer, larger reactors have similarities but most older ones do not, instead they are constructed with several redundancies for safety, which also increases the cost, he said.