Ramsey Lake condo development gets green light from city planners - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 09:27 AM | Calgary | -12.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Sudbury

Ramsey Lake condo development gets green light from city planners

One of the most contentious developments proposed in Greater Sudbury in recent years will have its day in court on June 22.

Developer was planning 171 units, but city staff recommending 147 be allowed

Sudbury developer Norm Eady looks over plans for his waterfront development on Ramsey Lake, which he appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, even though the city approved his project. (Erik White/CBC)

One of the most contentious developments proposed in Greater Sudbury in recent years will have its day in court on June 22.

City planners revealed on Friday afternoon that they are recommending city councillors approve a housing development on the shores of Ramsey Lake off Keast Drive.
Norm Eady is the developer behind the planned condominium and home development on the shores of Ramsey Lake off Keast Drive. (Erik White/CBC )

Developer Norm Eady first pitched this idea several years ago and the configuration has changed several times.

The latest versionwould see two seven-storeybuildingsand one three-storeybuildinggo up on the property, containing115 condominium units. There would also be56 single family homes.

The planners are recommending approval, but want the development trimmed down to 93 condo units and 54 houses.

Staff also say the project should only be approved ifthe developer meets50 conditions, many of them dealing with environmental and stormwater run-off concerns.

You can read the report here.

Individual citizens and groups have submitted 17 letters of concern with the city, while two letters of support for the project have been filed.

After the planning committee vote, the development would have to pass a full vote of Sudbury city council before going ahead.

There were some hard words exchanged the last time the planning committee considered this proposalin 2013, but no decision was made. Hear what that sounded like by clicking here: