The fast lane to affordable housing for one Toronto resident is in a laneway

City council will consider a report this week on the potential totransformsome of the city's lanewaysinto a resource fornew housing.

That's something Brandon Donnellywelcomes.

He's been thinking about building a laneway house for more than a decade and even went so far as to submit drawings to the city's planning department five years ago.

The 34-year-old real-estate developer said the reception back then wasn't positive.

"They had no idea what it was. 'Where's the street? There's no frontage.' It didn't register with them," he recounted. "They didn't support it so I decided to put it on hold and wait for the landscape to change."

He believes change is here: he recently brushed off his original drawings, made some adjustments and re-submitted his plans to build a lanewayhome behind a house he owns in the St. Clair Avenue and DufferinStreetarea.

"To build it, the cost of itis really the construction cost and the servicing costs, but it's a lot less than going out and buying a lot and trying to build a ground-related house," said Donnelly.

He rents out the main house now and plans to live in the 1000-square-foot, two-bedroom house that will front on the lanewayif the city gives him permission to build.

Not a new concept

There appears to be growing support forlanewayhome construction in Toronto. In March, Coun.Ana Bailao(Ward 18-Davenport) and Coun. Mary-Margaret McMahon (Ward 32-Beaches-East York) workedwith two community organizations to produce a report onthe concept of adding laneway housing by hosting public meetings and surveys.

• Toronto explores laneway homes as a solution to the housing crunch

The report indicated a majority of residents who provided input supported the idea, but raised concerns about parking, trafficand noise if more lanewayhomes were built.

Those concerns are expected to be addressed in the report tobe presented to city council later this week.

The city has more than 2,400lanewaysthat span more than 300 kilometres.

The city consideredlaneway housing back in 2006. At the time, city staff cited privacy concerns as part of the reasoning for not recommending moving forward.

City playing catch up

Donnelly will be going to the committee of adjustment later this summer to seek approval for his project. It will likely be an uphill battle: he said a city planner has already contacted him.

"They just don't have policy around it. They don't have a way of responding to it," he said. "It just doesn't meet the current land-use policy so they can't support it."

Donnelly said he's not discouraged.

"It's just a question of policies catching up to sentiment that's already there."