End 'streaming' in Ontario high schools, report urges

A new report from People for Education says Ontario students are being asked to make critical decisions about the direction of their educationat too young an age.

The study says asking Grade 8students to choose between academic and applied courses in high school sets some students up for failure.

It found that students taking applied courses in Grade 9 were much less likely to go to university and that students from low-income groups were more likely to enrol in applied courses.

It also cites a Toronto District School Boardreport that says only 40 per cent of students who took applied courses in Grade 9 had graduated after fiveyears.

"This is a practice that really leads to no graduation that sets up students for failure," saidJehad Aliweiwi, executive director of theLaidlaw Foundation, the group that commissioned the study.

Aliweiwi said research in the reportshows that Grade 8 is "way too young" for students to make a "potentially life-altering decision" and said streaming appears to be particularly harmful to students from economically challenged neighbourhoods.

"If you expect very little things from a student, they are going to deliver little things," he said.

Aliweiwisaid he'd like to see the applied versus academicdecision pushed back oneyear for students, until Grade 9.

His group also wants to study how schools in different jurisdictions handle streaming.

Applied and academic course streams were introduced in 1999.

Education Minister Liz Sandals said that the majority of Ontario students take the academic stream.

But she said the report has some strong data that students in applied students are struggling.

Sandals said it's up to the province to figure out why and how to fix it.

Watch the video above to see a full report from the CBC's Shannon Martin.

You can also read the report in the document embedded below: