City will fund Pride Toronto, even as uniformed officers blocked from parade

After a heated daylong debate, Toronto councillors voted 27-17 to give Pride Toronto $260,000 in funding for this summer's festival, despite the organization's decision to ask uniformed officers not to march in the parade.

Pride's supporters on council say the organization has followed all of the city's rules, and questioned the motives behind a motion todefundthe annual event. Coun. John Campbell put forward the motion calling for the city to suspend its funding unless it reaffirms its "core value ofinclusivity" by allowing uniformed officers to march in the parade.

• LGBTpolice officer 'disheartened' by Pride decision
• Pride board member explains decision to ban police
• Toronto police won't participate in Pride parade, chief says

"What Pride is asking the members who want to participate in the parade is ostensiblyto deny who they are and come incognito and not as police officers," Campbell told CBC Toronto before the vote.

The majority of councillorsdidn't share that view. Here's how the vote turned out, with names in green in favour of defunding the event and those in red against it:

Coun.KristynWong-Tam, whose ward hosts the annual festivities, pointed out thatthatcity staff and its legal department have recommendedthe fundingshouldn't be taken away.

Even without the money, she said,"we're going to continue to march."

Coun. Janet Davis asked why Pride should be mandated to welcome uniformed officers with guns. Coun. Shelley Carroll argued council pulling the funding would undermine Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders, who has said he's working with Pride's leadership on a solution.

Mayor John Tory echoed that sentiment, saying Pride Toronto, the LBGTcommunityand police all have his "unequivocal" support, and that he doesn't want to disrupt the ongoing discussions between the sides by changing the money the city provides.

Wong-Tam said the city hall debate, mainly focused on what rights police should have, doesn't address the issue that led to the situation.

"What I think is missing is the conversation of how do you actually improve policing relations? How do you hold police accountable to this minority community? And how do you actually create an opportunity for forward dialogue?"

Pride Toronto defends decision

Pride Toronto's executive directorOliviaNuamahwelcomed the decision, but said the lengthy debate proves her community still has to fight for its rights.

"We all understand we have a long way to go," she told reporters following the vote. "This conversation was exactly why we feel we need to take a step back and we really need to reconsider what it means to be LGBTQ in this city and start again."

Pastor BrentHawkes, a prominent gay rights advocate, accused Campbell and those supporting the motion of finding an "excuse" to go after Pride's funding.

"It's unfortunate that so many citycouncillorsare once again attacking Pride," he said, referencing past battles over event funding.

Hawkessaid Pride is being held to an unreasonable standard, adding, "you have to wonder what else is going on here."

Parade shutdown led to changes

Last year, Black Lives Matter Toronto brought the parade to a standstilluntil Pride's leadership agreed to a list of demands, including that police officers not be able to march in the parade in uniform and the force not havefloats or vehicles in the parade.

Following discussions with thecommunity it represents, Pride Toronto agreed to keep uniformed officers out.

Recently, New York Cityextended an invitationto Toronto police to march in its parade. Saunders saidhis officers won't be in uniform at that event, but can attend "if they want to, and I hope they would."

The police force has confirmed it will still be providing security throughout Pride festivities.