Toronto explores laneway homes as a solution to the housing crunch

The solution to Toronto's housing affordability crisis could be found in your own backyard.

In response to skyrocketing home prices, the city's looking to loosen the bylaws around developing one of its few sources ofunderused land: laneways.

A proposal went to public consultation Monday, exploring the possibility of lettinghomeowners build a secondary suite on the edge of a property leading into alaneway.

But don't call your realtor just yet.

Those smaller homes wouldn't be for sale, said AlexSharpe, one of the co-founders of the policy groupsco-ordinatingthe public discussion.

"It's not going to create a whole new crop of cheap houses that people can buy," said Sharpe, who lives in one of the city's few legal laneway homes and runs a group called Lanescape.

Instead, it would build onthe idea of a basement apartment. Alaneway home would have more natural light, butunlike a basement apartmentthere would be more privacy because the backyard acts asa bufferbetween the main home and secondary suite, Sharpe said.

In theory, the move could benefit both Toronto's renters and homeowners.

For property owners, it translates into an extra unit to cover the mortgage and house adult children or relatives. But it's also a way to cool down the long-term rental market, which has seen supply shrink alongsidethe rise of AirBNB, studies have found.

"We view laneways as an opportunity to expand the supply of units in existing residential neighbourhoods," Sharpe said. "They have the services, [they] have the infrastructure, the transit and they're well-connected.

Toronto laneway home owner

8 years ago

Duration 1:06

Alex Sharpe takes us inside his laneway home in Toronto.

"We've had a shortage of housing in Toronto in the last number of years and it's growing in intensity because we've run out of land."

Tiny home fever

Laneway homes may be new to Toronto, but Vancouver's city council gave landowners the green lightto start building them in 2009. Regina and Ottawa have also followed suit.

In fact, Vancouver actually provides a how-to guide to residents that includes potential floor plans for the tiny homes.

Toronto city councillors Ana Bailao and Mary-Margaret McMahon say laneways could becritical to the future of the city's development.

McMahon represents Ward 32,Beaches-East York, where she said there's a concern about the effect that high-rises would have on streetscapes.

"So this is a very measured approach to density," she said of the laneway discussions. "We have concerns about privacy creep and what-not so you're not going to see the Taj Mahal offour-storey lanewayhome; it's going to be in keeping with the character of the neighbourhoods."

Laneways rejected before

Toronto city staff cited privacy concerns that secondary homes might overlook their neighbour's backyards or cast shadows among their reasons in a 2006 report that recommended against allowing lanewayhousing.

Uncertainty about how to deliver public services likegarbage pick-up, barriers to emergency access and the possibility that residential properties would be subdivided also killed the idea from going ahead at the time.

But the current plan at the public debate would see all public services delivered from the front of the property, in the same way that it's done for rental suites, Coun. Bailao said.

"We already have basement apartments in the city of Toronto," said the Ward 18, Davenport councillor. "All we're saying is maybe we should allow it at the back of the houses as well."

Consultations are also happening within the planning departments about those changesand there's a push to name the city'slaneways so that first responders would be able to navigate them more easily, shesaid.

Province supports laneways

And, unlike in 2006, laneway advocates now have the support of Ontario law.

The province made changes to its Planning Act in 2011, when it introducednew legislation that requires municipalities to"establish official plan policies and zoning bylaw provisions" for secondary units including those for laneways.

"The policy at the province level is disjointed from the local level," Sharpe said, something he said he hopes the public consultations will change.