Alberta election: Wildrose resurgence not that surprising - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 05:01 PM | Calgary | -11.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
ElectionsOpinion

Alberta election: Wildrose resurgence not that surprising

Last December the PCs were celebrating a victory after several Wildrose MLA crossed the floor, but it seems it was not the end of the party after all. Political analyst Corey Hogan looks at the movement behind the Wildrose.

Just because a leader leads does not mean the party follows

Jim Prentice and Danielle Smith looked like an unbeatable team last December when the former Wildrose leader crossed over to join the PCs. (Jason Franson/Canadian Press)

Danielle Smith and Jim Prentice were all smiles lastDecemberwhen they announced a mass defection ofWildroseMLAsto the PCs.

And why not? With one act, they had combined a party at 35 per cent in the polls with one at 30 per cent.The math looked good unbeatable even and the future of the PC party assured.

Except, as we all know going into the third act of the provincial election campaign, it isn't.

So what happened? How could theWildroserebuild so quickly on the site of this political arson? How is it possible the polls are all suggesting that the relatively unknown Brian Jean could be Alberta's next premier?

It's possible because theWildrosewas neverSmith's to give away. To the surprise of cynics everywhere, theWildroseended up being the grassroots movement it always claimed to be.

WhileSmith's media-savvy persona undoubtedly catapulted theWildrosefurther and faster than they otherwise would have gone, she is the creation of a low-tax, small-government revolt, not the other way around.

The broader lesson is one about networks and institutions.

Twenty-five years ago Smith's gambit might have worked, because at that timedebates used to start and end whendecidersdecided. But today, just because a leader leads does not mean the party follows a hard lesson that politicians are just now grappling with.

Invigorated by social media, policy debates have grown into organic, living things that never conclude and require constant management. An issue is never completely settled as long as there's one person on the internetwilling to bang the drum for the other side. A cause is never really dead.

Parties truly are owned by their members and supporters now. Given all this it's also fair to ask putting aside thesturmunddrangover whether or not Liberal leader DavidSwannshould have negotiated a merger with the Alberta Party prior to this election could he have?

Certainly,Prentice and the PCs are learning the hard way thatSmith was not the living embodiment of theWildrose.

Messengers can be replaced and messages never die.