Think again - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 24, 2024, 01:49 AM | Calgary | -12.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Entertainment

Think again

Salman Rushdie discusses his thought-provoking novels

Salman Rushdie discusses his thought-provoking novels

Salman Rushdie has defied a death warrant and fundamentalist wrath to remain one of contemporary literature's best prose stylists. ((Sean Gallup/Getty Images))
Salman Rushdie is one of the finest prose stylists at work today, and also among the most famous. Sadly, for much of his career, its not his enormous talent that has determined his fame. The fact that so many non-readers know Rushdies name is largely the handiwork of Irans late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who deemed the authors 1988 novel The Satanic Verses an affront to Islam and subsequently ordered the British author killed. While Khomeinis fatwa (religious edict) has never been officially withdrawn, it no longer preys on Rushdie. But his life continues to be of great interest to the media, who lavished much coverage on his recent divorce from model/cookbook author Padma Lakshmi.

'I have no problem with religion, as long as its private. If people find it consoling or uplifting or nourishing not my business. Where it becomes my business is when it comes into the public arena and is a social and political force that seeks to impose certain norms on society.'

The notoriety has curtailed Rushdies public appearances, but it has never stifled his creativity. After releasing two modern novels, Fury (2001) and Shalimar the Clown (2006), the Booker-winning author retreated to the past for his latest yarn. Set in 16th-century India, The Enchantress of Florence tells the story of an enigmatic Italian named Niccolo Vespucci, who schemes his way into the court of the Mughal emperor Akbar the Great, in order to convince the ruler of the unthinkable: that he, Niccolo, is a blood relation.

The Enchantress of Florence has all the hallmarks of Rushdies fiction: sumptuous prose, a magic-realist tone, far-reaching family histories, sexual intrigue and the push-pull between East and West. Whats more, despite its setting, The Enchantress of Florence is full of contemporary resonance. The 60-year-old author spoke to CBCNews.ca about staying subversive, trying to keep his private life private and why he must constantly apologize to his female companions.

Q: Given this tumultuous period were living in, it feels almost subversive for you to write a novel not set in contemporary times.

A: I always want books to be subversive. I want books to shake things up. But really, once Ive worked out the story that Im trying to tell, Im not thinking outside that. I like to write books that make people think afresh, if possible. Whether thats the past or the present, it doesnt matter. Ive often written books that show how history and peoples private lives collided and affected each other, whether its Andalusian Spain in The Moors Last Sigh or the birth of a religion in The Satanic Verses or the partition of India in Midnights Children. It seems to do with my training; my understanding of the world is to look at how the public and the private intersect and collide. Can we shape the times in which we live or are we at their mercy? Those are the questions that have been behind almost everything Ive written.

Q: A lot of people assume that were living in the most liberal time the world has ever seen. Yet, there are periods in history, like what you describe in the new novel, that seem nearly as permissive.

A: Theres a kind of tragedy in it. These are usually just bursts, followed by stagnation or regression. The Mughal emperors, the first five of them were pretty tolerant, particularly the middle three: Akbar, and his son, Jahangir, and his son, Shah Jahan. All of them had very long reigns, almost 150 years between them. In that time, it was a period of great openness and tolerance and artistic flowering, but after that, you kind of get Darth Vader. You get Aurangzeb, a fanatic, a temple-smasher very repressive. Thats who we are, I guess; maybe we recoil from too much progress.

(Knopf Canada)
Q: There are a number of passages in the book that have real currency. One of the emperors advisors says, "All true believers have good reasons for disbelieving in every god except their own and so it is they who, between them, give me all the reasons for believing in none." Is this a comment on the current vogue for atheism?

A: Maybe its making a slight comeback. In the 60s and 70s, religion was in extreme retreat. It really felt as if that subject was over. The idea that we would have to reckon with religion as a major force in public life would have seemed absurd, if you had suggested it to me when I was in my 20s. For someone of my generation, whats been shocking is the way that religion has rushed back and returned to public life. And its only happened since the 1980s. In the Eastern hemisphere, its the rise of radical Islam and here it has to do with the Christian right.

If theres a slight correction [now], its overdue. But no matter how brilliant [atheist polemicist] Christopher Hitchens is, or Richard Dawkins, or Daniel Dennett is, its not books that are going to do it. Its going to be another change in public consciousness. I have seen the pendulum swing one way, I can certainly conceive of it swinging the other way. On the whole, that would be a good thing. Where I have a slightly different position to Hitchens and Dawkins is that I have no problem with religion, as long as its private. If people find it consoling or uplifting or nourishing not my business. Why should I dictate to people what they should enjoy? I may think theyre dumb, but its not my business. Where it becomes my business is when it comes into the public arena and is a social and political force that seeks to impose certain norms on society. Then, I think it becomes a malicious force.

Q: Quoting again from the book, one Muslim character says, "The English had no future on this earth A race that rejected the idea of personal sacrifice would surely be erased from times record before too long." In the age of suicide bombing, this seems like more than just a throwaway line.

A: Its a line with irony in it, because [in the book] its talking about people who were to become the next imperialists of India. Its a joke about the future.

Q: Coming back to the present, do you think that the current war against Muslim fundamentalists many of whom are quite prepared to make the ultimate personal sacrifice can be won?

A: I think it can be won, and the reason it can be won is that that kind of activity has a very limited constituency in the Muslim world. Most people in the Muslim world hate it, too. After all, most of the people being killed in Iraq are not Americans, its Muslims, by other Muslims. I think the thing that will end it is the growing revulsion for that kind of activity. You can see a parallel with what happened with the IRA. The reason the IRA were forced to the conference table and to give up their weapons was that their own constituency, the Catholics in northern Ireland, got sick of it and got sick of living in the world [the IRA] helped to create.

Q: The novel seems to be a long-form argument in favour of storytelling. Do you think that fiction has lost face in recent years?

A: Theres no question that if you talk to publishers, you talk to booksellers, this is a non-fictional moment; people are buying a lot more non-fictional material than fictional. I myself think its a kind of fad. Now that weve had this revelation that a lot of things that have been posing as non-fiction turn out to be highly invented, I think that discredits the memoir form. And I think thats a sad thing, because that whole area of creative non-fiction is a very rich area.

Also, with this book, its an age where independent verification is not available. A stranger comes and he says hes so and so well, maybe he is and maybe he isnt, but youve got no way of knowing; you can only judge his character and his story. And thats exactly parallel to the act of writing a novel: youve got to decide whether you buy into it.

Rushdie's writing continues to provoke protests, such as this one in Islamabad, Pakistan in 2007. ((Paula Bronstein/Getty Images))
Q: Is there any area of the literary craft in which you feel you could improve?

A: Im always looking for things I havent done. Somebody I was talking to yesterday said that [The Enchantress of Florence] is not like my other books. And I said, "Yeah, but thats what they always say." When I write The Ground Beneath Her Feet, they say, "What, rock n roll music?" When I write Fury, they say, "What, New York City now?" The truth is, I dont like to repeat myself. I always like to go somewhere I havent been, and thats true not only in terms of subject matter, but technically, too.

I have a feeling that theres a book I havent written thats a large-scale social novel about the England in which Ive spent so much time. My instinct is that it would not at all be magic-realist. It feels to me like it would be an old-fashioned, English realist novel. Theres a thing over there [in England], a piece of my experience that Ive never explored.

Q: From the fatwa to your recent divorce from Padma Lakshmi, youve remained a fixture in the tabloid press. Has any creative good come from all that attention?

A: No, not really. The years of the fatwa, maybe, because it forced me to pay attention to a subject that is, as weve been saying, now everyones subject. But for the rest, no. I hate having my private life being public. Most of my private life has been private; Ive had a number of close personal relationships and nobodys known a damn thing about them. But I had this one marriage which for all sorts of reasons that we dont have to go into became very public and, I discovered, I dont like it.

One of the things that has been a relief in the last year or so since my marriage broke up is that Ive actually been able to take my private life back into private. Even though theres been some sort of idiot media speculation about this or that liaison, the truth is, Ive managed to do it Ive managed to get what should be out of the public eye out of the public eye. I like that; I much prefer it. But its difficult for my women friends. Any time I show up anywhere wheres theres a camera, if theres a woman with me, its like Boom! [Claps.] I have to apologize to my friends: "The moment you go anywhere with me, suddenly [according to the tabloids], were having sex."

The Enchantress of Florence is in stores now.

Andre Mayer writes about the arts for CBCNews.ca.