Assembly of First Nations endorses fight against Ontario Mtis self-government bill

Standing in front of Centre Block on Parliament Hill on Wednesday, John Turner pointed to an old black-and-white picture of his ancestors featured in a 2019 edition of the Mtis Voyageur newsletter.

The family, said Turner, were members of theTeme-Augama Anishnabai(Temagami First Nation) in northernOntario and not Mtis, as their presence in the Mtis Nation of Ontario (MNO) publication might suggest.

"When you talk about identity theft, this is such a clear-cut case," said Turner, who is second chief of the Teme-Augama Anishnabaicouncil, in an interview.

"On one hand, it's disturbing. On the other hand, if they have tens of thousands of members, surely to God they can find pictures of their own ancestors. No descendants of these people are Mtis."

Turner was one man in a crowd of about 200 that bused into Ottawato protest against proposed federal legislation that would confirm the MNO's internal Indigenous self-government rights.

In choosing to recognize the MNO, the First Nations leaders say Canada failed to consult them and failed to properly verify the MNO's citizens are truly Mtis.

The Mtis Nation emerged as distinct people of mixed First Nations and European origins in the Prairies in the late 18th century. But the roots of today's battle are in the Ontario's government's 2017 decision to recognize six new historic Mtis communities in the province.

The decision stretched the Mtis homeland as far east as the Ottawa river on the Quebec border an area where First Nations maintain their elders never spoke of a Mtis presence.

"This is a pure fabrication of the federal government and the provincial government," said Nipissing First Nation Chief Scott McLeod, a spokesman for the Chiefs of Ontario umbrella group on the issue.

The Canadian government signed an updated self-government agreement with the MNO earlier this year, promising to ratify it through legislation. The First Nations want that legislation Bill C-53 cancelled.

The Assembly of First Nations, representing more than 600 First Nations countrywide, backed the cause on Wednesday.

"Bill C-53 was advanced without proper consultation with First Nations," said interim National Chief Joanna Bernard.

In prepared remarks to the crowd, Bernard said shehad written to the prime minister urging the bill be halted until that consultation happens, while several other First Nations groups issued statementssupporting the Ontario chiefs.

MNO celebrates Powley decision

The MNO, however, accuses First Nations of denialism and disingenuousness.

MNO President Margaret Froh points to the Supreme Court of Canada's landmark Powley decision, which affirmed the existence of a historic Mtis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.

Tuesday was the 20th anniversary of the ruling, which laid out the 10-part Powley test for affirming Mtis rights. The MNO marked the occasion by releasing a documentary, The Hunt for Justice: The Powley Story.

Frohsaidshe is "concerned, again, on the 20th anniversary, after finally achieving that recognition, that there are others that are trying to take us back to the time Mtis were not recognized."

Froh said she hopes the film educates people about how hard the Mtis have fought for their rights and recognition. She said she sees respectful dialogue as the solution, but she also won't back down on Bill C-53.

"After 200 years of fighting for recognition, the time has come," she said.

Gull Bay First Nation Chief Wilfred King arguedPowley has been "misconstrued and misapplied." In his view, Powley only established harvesting rights in Sault Ste. Marie and didn't concern land title or potential rights anywhere else.

"Yes, we recognize that there are certain Mtis rights, but very limited rights," he told CBC News at Wednesday'srally.

The Manitoba Mtis Federation (MMF) broke from the Mtis National Council over theissue of thenew Mtis communities in Ontario in 2021, and voiced support for the rally Wednesday by condemningthe "unfounded and illegitimate"communities.

In a statement, MMFPresident David Chartrand accused the MNO of using Red River Mtis symbols and culture to "camouflage" baseless claims and identity theft.

"They are not us they are not our kin and we do not know them," said Chartand.

Objections 'ironic,' says MNO councillor

According to Mitch Case, regional councillor for the MNO community that includes Sault Ste. Marie, there is irony in this position.

The new Powley film shows a younger Chartrand hailing the ruling at the time, saying it "clearly sets the tone for the future for our people."

"Quite frankly, some of the people who are now objecting to us were some of the strongest voices celebrating us 20 years ago," said Case.

"So that's an interesting, ironic twist of history."

Likewise, Case said he still has the old AFNnewsrelease congratulating the Mtis on the Powley win. He called it incredibly unfortunate to see the AFN now protesting Bill C-53. What concerns him most, he added, is the politically heated rhetoric's impact on MNO youth.

He told an anecdote abouta new mother who brought her week-old daughter to celebrate her first Powley day. He too touted discussion with First Nations as the solution but said discussion must begin with acceptance that Mtis exist in Ontario.

"Telling my community we don't exist, telling that little girl that she doesn't have a culture or a story, that's a non-starter for me," he said.

At a newsconference Wednesday afternoon, the First Nations said it's the MNO being disingenuous, making 11th-hour calls for dialogue while being aggressive in politicalback rooms.

The bill was fast-tracked to the committee stage in the House of Commons before the summer break, and the federal government has given no indication it intends to withdraw it.

If that's the case, said the AFN's Ontario regional chief, the fight will continue.

"My chiefs are already putting up their flags," Glen Hare told reporters.

"'No trespassing.'"