Nunatsiavut government demands Liberal MP's demotion over NunatuKavut comments

The Nunatsiavut government of northern Labrador wants a Liberal MP demoted over "inaccurate comments" she made praising a court ruling concerning NunatuKavut Community Council.

Yvonne Jones, who represents Labrador in the House of Commons, was among those celebrating when a Federal Court judge this week dismissed anInnu Nation bid to cancel the federal government's memorandum of understanding with NCC.

Jones is one of NunatuKavut's 6,000 members who self-identify as Inuit in south and central Labrador. NCC's claims are disputed byNunatsiavut and national organization Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, which don't recognize the group asan Inuit collective.

"Congratulations NunatuKavut on winning this historic and once again precedent setting court ruling that defines and recognizes the rights," the MP wrote on social media.

"Now it's time to recognize your legitimate and constitutional rights of southern and central Inuitof Labrador."

Nunatsiavut, a self-governing Inuit body with a ratified modern treaty, issued a statement on Friday "to make it abundantly clear that the Federal Court very explicitly states that the NCC's section 35 status has not been established in law in this case, or in previous court cases."

Judge Cecily Y. Strickland held that "the MOU does not create, recognize or deny any legal or constitutional right or obligation" for either Canada or NCC.

"The MOU does not recognize the NCC as 'Aboriginal peoples of Canada' pursuant to section 35 of the Constitution," Strickland wrote.

"Rather, the MOU is a policy decision to engage in without-prejudice discussions with NCC. It is intended as an expression of goodwill and a political commitment to discussion."

Both NunatuKavut and Innu Nation, which comprisestwo First Nations in Labrador, declared victory based on differing interpretations of Strickland's decision.

Nunatsiavut, which acted as anintervenorin the case in support ofthe Innu,said it's "deeply concerned by the inaccurate comments" from Jones and demanded her removal from parliamentary secretary posts in Northern Affairs and Defence.

"Public officials are entrusted with the responsibility of acting with accountability, impartiality and within the rule of law," Nunatsiavut said in its statement.

"Nunatsiavut believes that Ms. Jones has not met these standards in her role as a member of parliament and a parliamentary secretary due to her public comments and actions to advance the agenda of the NCC."

Jones's MP office did not respond to emailed requests for comment on Friday.

Friction has history

NunatuKavut was previously known as the Labrador Mtis Association and then the Labrador Mtis Nation until 2010.

In 2004, Jones was the only member of the provincial legislature who voted against ratifying Nunatsiavut's modern treaty, the Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement.

"The Mtis people of Labrador have to be heard. They have to be safeguarded. Their rights, too, have to be proclaimed as Aboriginal people in Labrador," shetold the legislature at the time.

The Innu Nation, meanwhile, has also taken issue with Jones after shecalled the Innu court challenge "misguided"in 2019.

In a post of its ownThursday, theInnu Nation accused Jones of misleading the public and NCC members about what the court actually said.

In a statement issued Wednesday evening, the Innu Nationsaid, "The court has confirmed that NCC has no standing as an Indigenous people as the MOU is meaningless other than that it allows for a process to discuss the bogus claims."

NunatuKavut, however, praised the dismissal of the applicationasan unequivocal victory.

"This is particularly so as this court case has been used as part of a targeted and violent misinformation campaign against NCC and our people by Innu Nation and Nunatsiavutgovernment," said President Todd Russellin a statement.

Russell,a former Liberal MP for Labrador, has rejectedallegations of identity theft as ludicrous and defamatory.

Jones tagged provincial and federal Liberals in her post, including Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Gary Anandasangaree.

Anandasangaree was not made available for an interview but in a statement a spokesperson contradicted Jones's interpretation of the decision.

"The Federal Court affirmed that this MOU does not affect legal rights, impose legal obligations, or cause prejudicial effects to any of the parties involved in this litigation, and that the duty to consult was not triggered," wrote spokesperson Matthieu Perrotin.

The minister's office respects the decision and is reviewing it, Perrotin said, adding that the MOU aims to resolve outstanding questions about NunatuKavut's asserted rights.

"The MOU sets the priorities for the discussions, including better understanding rights that the NunatuKavut Community Council may hold, and discussions continue," he wrote.

Perrotin declined to comment on the demand for Jones's removal.

NunatuKavut has made four rejected land claim submissions under Canada's comprehensive land claims policy since 1991.In 2007, the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal decision that found the group has "credible but unproven claim," to Indigenous rights, which isstrong enough to trigger the Crown's duty to consult.