Health ministers wrap tense talks with no agreement on federal health funding - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 03:55 PM | Calgary | -10.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Politics

Health ministers wrap tense talks with no agreement on federal health funding

Federal and provincial health ministers emerged from a day of tense talks in Toronto still at odds over the federal government's planned cut to the annual increase in federal funding for health care.

Ottawa plans to reduce annual increases in health transfers

Federal Health Minister Jane Philpott, centre, speaks during a federal, provincial and territorial health ministers' meeting in Toronto on, October 18, 2016. (Christopher Katsarov/Canadian Press)

Federal and provincial health ministers emerged froma day of tense talks in Toronto still at oddsover the federal government'splanned cut to the annual increase in federal funding for health care.

Next year the Canada Health Transfer, the amount of money the federal government givesthe provinces each year to pay for health care, will stop increasing by six per cent and instead will only increase by three per cent.

Quebec Health MinisterGatanBarrette said the single "concrete" takeaway from the meeting is that the federal government is cutting health-care funding and forcing the provinces and territories to make tough choices.

"For today we know there will be a cut of $60 billion of funding from the federal government over the next 10 years," Barrette said.

"That means all provincesand territoriesmust make difficult choices because we are being asked to do more with less. And on top of that we are being told what to do. So I don't think this is the end of the story."

Barrette saidthe premiers are frustrated not only with the prospect of less money, but also with having any additional money tied to delivering specific programs, such as home care. He is optimistic the overall system can be improved, however.

Philpottdefended the government's funding position, insisting that any new investments must be made with a clear plan to improve patient care.

"It's really important for Canadians to know that we are going to continue to contribute to the Canadian Health Transfer," she said."In fact over the next five years there will be an additional contribution, something in the order of $19 billion on top of the already $36 billion per year."

Philpott said that amount will continue to rise over time and the Liberal governmentwill give additional funds, first for home care, and then down the line for other areas such as mental health, she said.

"Canadians want to see their health-care system get better and we have a responsibility to do that," she said.

'Responsibility' to deliver

Philpott said discussions over dollars will continue, but the "bottom line" is that there is a desire to put patients first.

"I've been pleased there is so much common ground," she said, noting that all the ministers agreed on improving care and services in a number of areas including:

  • Making prescription medication affordable.
  • Taking action on the opioid crisis.
  • Working towarda new health accord.
  • Committing to further talks on home care.
  • Increasing access to mental health.
  • Fostering innovation in the health-care sector.

But the most pressing issue remained the federal government's plan to cut the annual funding increase from six per cent tothree per cent.

Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskinscalled thereduction inthe increase ofthe transfer "inadequate" and said it signalleda "declining partnership"with Ottawaas health-care costs continue to increase at a greater rate than the health transfer.

Ontario's health minister: 'You can only constrain [spending] for so long'

8 years ago
Duration 8:18
Eric Hoskins makes the case for why the provinces aren't happy with a three per cent increase from the federal government.

"So to put that in context,"Hoskins said,"Ontario stands to gain in home and community care [with]the $3-billion commitment made by the federal government, to the tune of probably $250 million next year, roughly, but we will lose approximately $400 million if the federal government goes through with their position that the [health transfer] will be limited to three per cent."

He also said many of the ministers took offence at Philpott's suggestion that federal funds earmarked for health care went into general revenues without certainty it was being spent on health services.

Innovation, accountability

Laying out her demands Monday, Philpott said there must bemore innovationand accountability measures.

"If we are going to make more investments, they need to go to health," she said, drawing some criticism for suggesting the provinces aren't adequately managing health spending.

The federal government has also pledged more than $3 billion in targeted funding for home care, including palliative care.

A reduction in the rate of increase of the Canada Health Transfer will mean a $1-billion shortfall nationally in 2017-18, Hoskins said.

The sixpercent annual increase has been in place since the last health accord was negotiated in 2004.

The provinces and territories are pushing topostpone the reduced rate until Prime Minister Justin Trudeau meets with premiers in a meeting scheduled for Dec. 8-9.

The great debate over health care

8 years ago
Duration 2:29
We take a look back at the 12 years since the federal government hashed out a health-care deal with the provinces.