Federal ban on conversion therapy could face constitutional hurdles - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 09:01 AM | Calgary | -16.6°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Politics

Federal ban on conversion therapy could face constitutional hurdles

Changing the Criminal Code to enact a national ban on the controversial practice of conversion therapy could face some constitutional hurdles, legal experts say.

CanadianPsychological Association has dismissed the practice and called it harmful

Changing the Criminal Code to enact a national ban on the controversial practise of conversion therapy could face some constitutional hurdles, legal experts say. (CBC)

The federal government's indication that it might changethe Criminal Code to enact a national ban on the controversial practice of conversion therapy could face some constitutional hurdles, legal experts say.

Conversion therapyseeks to change an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity, and "convert" someone who is gay, lesbian or bisexual into a heterosexual.

"It would seem to me thatusing the criminal law is always tricky," saidCarissima Mathen,vice-dean of University of Ottawa's faculty of law and an expert in constitutional law. "You immediately run into potential constitutional issues."

In March, the federal government rejected a petition with more than 18,000 signaturescalling for a national ban on conversion therapy.

The governmentsaid at the time that, "conversion therapies are immoral, painful, and do not reflect the values of our government or those of Canadians." Ottawa also said that the governance of conversion therapy is largely a provincial and territorial issue, since it is sometimes carried out by members of the health profession.

What is conversion therapy? An expert explains

5 years ago
Duration 1:36
Dr. Kristopher Wells is one of the driving forces behind the campaign to ban conversion therapy in Canada. He is the Canada Research Chair for the Public Understanding of Sexual & Gender Minority Youth and describes the dangers of the controversial therapy.

However,according to a letter sent in June to Alberta's JusticeMinisterDoug Schweitzer, the federal government is now looking at ways to reform the Criminal Code in order to "combat conversiontherapy."

The letter, signedby federal Justice MinisterDavid Lametti, Health Minister Ginette Petitpas Taylor and Edmonton Centre MP Randy Boissonnault, special adviser on LGBT issues to the prime minister, provides few details on what legal remedies arebeing considered. Instead, it says the government islooking at Criminal Code reforms to "better prevent, punish, and deter this discredited and dangerous practice."

Limit harm

Health organizations, including the CanadianPsychological Association, have dismissed the treatment, saying it has noefficacy. They have also warned that the effects of such therapy can be harmful,resultingin distress, anxiety, self-harm and suicide.

Parliament does have the power to determine something is harmful, and, as a general rule, canseek to limit that harm from occurring, Mathen said.

And courts have generally given the government afairly wide berth and broad latitude to decide what is harmful, she noted. But when it comes to something like conversion therapy, orthe act of counselling, as opposed to the administration of a potentially harmfulremedy like a drug,the federal government could run into a couple of hurdles.

Minister of Justice David Lametti has indicated the government islooking at Criminal Code reforms to 'better prevent, punish, and deter' conversion therapy. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

One key question, Mathen said, will be: "Howdo you define when therapy crosses the line?"

If the government changes the code, Mathen said someone who administers conversion therapybut is prevented from doing so could launch a challenge under Section2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, arguing their freedom of expression is being violated.

And oncethe governmentuses criminal law power, with, presumably, some potential jail sentence, that couldtrigger Section 7 of the charter that protects people from deprivation of liberty, she said.

"You're facing a potential Section 7 challenge on the basis that the law is just too blunt a tooland you're putting people at risk of imprisonment in ways that are fundamentally unfair."

A number of provinces have enacted laws to restrict conversion therapy. In 2015, for example, Ontario passed its own law to ban conversion therapy but it was limited in scope. It made it illegal for health professionalsto provide conversion therapy and it applied to minors.

But conversion therapy itselfis not banned outright. This means that some faith-based communitiesthat view homosexuality as a sin are free to practise the therapy in Canada.

Freedom of religion

Daniel Lerner, a Toronto-based defence lawyerwho was a former Ontario Crown prosecutor,said individuals who seek out the therapy could potentiallychallenge any governmentunder Section 2 of the charter,with afreedom of religion argument.

"I can see somebody making a freedom of religion argumentthatmy religionrequires me to have this conversion. And you're preventing me from exercising my religion."

Under Section7, an individual could also argue that theybelieve theirsecurity of the person requires themto undergo conversion therapy and the government is depriving them of that service.

Sen. Serge Joyal introduced his own bill in April in an attempt to curtail conversion therapy. (Government of Canada website)

Still, Lerner believes that despite any charter challenges, thegovernmentwould likelyprevail.

"Certainlythe government does put in laws that they believe [are] to save people from themselves," he said.

"There's just such a strong medical consensus out there about conversion therapy.You can objectively point to the dangers of it."

Sen.Serge Joyal, chair of the legal and constitutional affairs Senate committee,introduced his own bill in April in an attempt to curtail conversion therapy. His bill would criminalize anyone who advertises to provide conversion therapy or "receives a financial or other material benefit from providingconversion therapy to minors."

Concerned his bill would face freedom of religion issues, Joyal said he crafted his legislation to be similar to the new prostitution laws of2014 after theSupreme Court struck down Canada's prostitution laws.

"I said to myself if that is the context into which prostitution is regulated, we could do the same with conversion therapy and we would not run the risk of facing a charter issue."

But the prostitution law has also faced a court challenge,with lawyersrepresenting two London, Ont., escort agency owners arguing that law violates the charter forsex workers by not ensuring their "security of the person."

It's not yet clear how that challenge will be decided.

Nor is it clear how Joyal's bill will fare, or what steps the federal government, which has risen for the summer,might take to move forward any legislation around conversion therapy.

With files from Hannah Thibedeau