Harperman case: Can public servants be political activists?

An investigation into an Ottawa federal scientist who wrote and performedan anti-Harper protest song and postedit to YouTubehas sparked a debate about just how political Canada's public servants are allowed to be.

• Federal scientist put on leave over Harperman protest song
• Federal public servants warned about social media use
• More public servants running for office in 2015

Tony Turner, a scientist in habitat planning at Environment Canada, was sent home on leave with pay pending a government investigation into the making ofHarperman, a highly critical song about Conservative Leader Stephen Harperthat has amassed more than 280,000 hits since June.

At issue is whether Turner violated thecode of ethics that all public servants must adhere to one thatmandates they be impartial and non-partisan.

At the same time,the courtshave upheld public servants'right to engage in political activity.

So how should public servants strike thebalance between what's forbidden under the code and permitted by the courts?

"These are very old debates and very old discussions," saidRobert Shepherd, a professor at the Carleton University SchoolofPublicPolicy andAdministration. "Thisis a major question, and it'sstill being tested."

What is the code?

All federal public servants, some 400,000 people,are bound by theValues and Ethics Code for the Public Sector, which states that a "professional and non-partisan federal public sector is integral to our democracy."

It statesthat all public servants are expected to carry out their duties "in anon-partisan and impartial manner" and thatthey must "loyally" serve their departmental ministers.

A non-partisan public service is"an important cornerstone of Canadian democracy," saidStephenMaguire, executive director of the Centre on Values and Ethics at Carleton University.

"We elect the government of the day and we expect that government to carry out the promises that it made during the election,and it can't do that if its policy and the implementation of that policy is actively subverted by the public service."

Supreme Court ruling sparks change

The ideaof anon-partisan public service took a hit in1991 when theSupreme Courtupheld public servants'rights to engage in political activities.

Loyalty to the government of Canada andthe serviceswe perform on behalf on Canadians does notextend to a blind loyalty to one politician's positions.-DebiDaviau, president of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada

The court ruled thatbanning political activity infringeson workers' Charter rights to freedom of expression.

Public servants can now volunteer for election campaigns, post political lawn signs, make phonecalls anddeliver flyersso long as they don't use office resources and their activities don'timpede their ability to do their jobs.

"When we look at this individual case of an Environment Canada scientist who studies migratory birds, it's quite difficult to make the link between the work he does and any impact that video might have on his ability to do his work," said Debi Daviau, president of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada, the union that represents public servants.

"If there'sanyonewho's guilty of getting in the way of our members doing their jobs impartially, it'sthe Harper government and their policies."

She said political activity doesn't jeopardizeCanada's tradition of anon-partisan public service.

"A non-partisan publicserviceis exactly what we are and we havea duty of loyalty to the government of Canada that we uphold in the highest regard," she said.

"Nonetheless,that loyalty to the government of Canada andthe serviceswe perform on behalf on Canadians does notextend to a blind loyalty to one politician's positions."

'You can't be half-pregnant'

Donald Savoie, the Canada Research Chair in public administration and governance at the University of Moncton, disagrees.

"In my view, regardless of what the Supreme Court might say, public servants should not become politicalactors, especially in the middle of campaigns," he said. "They are not political actors. We have political actors;they are politicians."

He said you can't be politically active and non-partisan at the same time.

"Ifyou start handing out flyers and you appear in videos,you become a part of thatyou become partisan. You can't be half-pregnant," he said.

Public servantsrun for office

Public servants can run for politicaloffice, so long as they get permission from thePublic Service Commission and take a leave of absence.A record number of35are running in the 2015 federal election.

Still, many public servants remain unclear as to what is acceptable political behaviour.

Chris Rodgers, the Liberal candidate in the Ottawa riding of Carleton who tookleave from his job as a policy analyst at Public Safety Canada to run, says he meets public servants who are afraid to get politicallyinvolved.

"They don't feel they can put a sign on their yard. They're concerned whether they can go and knock on some doors in the evening," Rodgers told CBC News. "These are people who can and should be able to separate their private political activities from their professional work."

'Truth to power'

Maguiresaid public servants also have a responsibility to "speak truth to power."

"If they think there are problems with a governmentpolicy, it'stheirjob to pointit out," he said."Inthis government, speaking truth to power has not been encouraged, to put it mildly."

Daviau agrees, and says the Turner investigation is just the latest example of the government muzzling federal scientists.

• FAQ: The issues around muzzling government scientists
• Muzzling of federal scientists widespread, survey suggests

But Shepherdsaystheresponsibility to speak truth to power does not give public servants permission to engage in political activism.

"The expression or the vehicle for doing that is to use internal avenues, not to be activists outside of the established mechanisms within the public service," he said.

A public servant concerned about government policy who exhausts all other avenues and chooses to go public, he says, must be willing to accept the consequences.