Senator rejects minister's call to pass Liberal guns bill quickly - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 03:16 AM | Calgary | -14.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Politics

Senator rejects minister's call to pass Liberal guns bill quickly

A battle appears to be brewing between senators and Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino as he tries to see the Liberals' controversial gun legislation passed swiftly into law.

Mendicino 'eager' to pass Bill C-21 before the summer break

A man in a grey suit and tie is shown speaking at a podium, with shadows covering the edges of the frame.
Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino called on Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre 'to tell his senators to get down to work.' (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

A battle appears to be brewing between senators and Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicinoas he tries to see the Liberals' controversial gun legislation passed swiftly into law.

On Thursday, his office sent a letter to leaders of the different Senate groups and the chair of a committeesaying the minister is "eager" to answer senators' questions about Bill C-21 "given the urgency of passing legislation to protect Canadians."

The letter comes with less than a month left before the House of Commons and Senate plan to break for summer. The Liberals have described the gun legislation as a priority bill that it wants to see passed into law within weeks.

The bill seeks to turn a national handgun freeze into law, combat the scourge of homemade guns and ban what it calls "assault-style" weapons measures critics of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have called a misguided effort to combat gun violence.

The government's attempts to define which weapons are covered under a ban on guns it deems unfit for civilian use have led to outrage from the Tories, Indigenous communities and other firearms owners.

Those critics argue that commonly used hunting rifles would fall under the proposed law something the Liberals say was not the intent.

Earlier in the year, the Liberals withdrew amendments to the bill that sought to enshrine a May 2020 regulatory ban on some 1,500 firearms models and variants and covered hundreds of additional guns.

Liberals tweaked bill following backlash

In the wake of widespread backlash over the proposed definition, including from the NDP, the government decided instead that it would enact regulations through the Firearms Act to ensure that guns are classified before they can enter the Canadian market.

The regulations would not be retroactive, so they would not apply to nearly 300 newer models of firearms that were not included in the 2020 ban.

Conservative Senate leader Don Plett accused Mendicino on Thursday of showing "unmitigated gall" by asking senators to hurry when MPs spent months studying the bill before it passed in the House of Commons.

A man wearing glasses is shown in a shirt and tie.
Conservative Senator Don Plett said he plans to vote against the bill as it is currently written and try to block it from passing. (Chris Rands/CBC)

It was approved last month in a vote of 207 to 113, with NDP, Bloc Quebecois and Green members of Parliament voting with the Liberals. The Tories stood opposed.

"Listen, we agree that one Canadian killed by gun violence is too many," said Plett, referring to a line in Mendicino's letter.

"But that cannot be why the government is taking decisive action to strengthen Canada's gun laws. There's got to be a host of reasons why we want to strengthen Canada's gun laws."

Plett said he plans to vote against the bill as it is currently written and try to block it from passing. He said he feels it punishes firearms users like sport shooters and questions whether he could support even an amended bill.

Speaking to reporters, Mendicino called on Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre "to tell his senators to get down to work" and described it as a matter of public safety.

"Somehow he expects that we are not supposed to give it sober second thought and indeed some kind of a vetting," said Plett.

"He basically says, 'I've looked at the bill, I say it's good, so give it your rubber stamp and let's move on with things.' Well, that's not how the Senate works."