Pharmacare may appeal to premiers seeking consensus this week in N.B.

EricHoskinsgivesCanada's premiers credit for being the catalyst for his current mission.

The physician and humanitarian aid workerwho most recently served as Ontario's health minister was named last February to head a federal advisory council on how to implement a nationalpharmacareprogram.

Implement is the key word in that sentence. Canada hastalked about the need for a national drug benefit program for years, even decades. Things now appear to have moved on to a different question: How?

"I'll thank the premiers for their leadership on this issue,"HoskinstoldCBCNews, previewing the remarks he's scheduled to make at a roundtable breakfast onpharmacareFriday on the sidelines of the Council of the Federation talks in Saint Andrews, N.B. "[The council] really is responsible for elevating this to a higher level."

Canada's premiers have been calling for a nationalpharmacareprogram since 2004.But after some early progress working with Paul Martin's Liberal government, the concept stalled throughStephen Harper's 10-year tenure.

At last summer's meeting in Edmonton, the premiers' closing statement called on the federal government to start working on a nationalpharmacareplan.

That's whereHoskinscomes in.

He's spending his summer talking toprovincial and territorial ministers and officialssome justrecently his colleagues as well asmedical professional, labour and patient advocacy groups.

"I would describe the response of thehealth ministers as cautious optimism," he said.

Optimistic because they all want to be involved in the process, he said, but cautious because no one knows what the eventual model might look like and how much it might cost.

Is Ontario still onside?

One of the firstannouncements from Ontario Premier Doug Ford's new Progressive Conservative government cutprovincial drug coverage for kids and young adults already covered by private drug plans.

It saves Ontario taxpayers money. But is it also a sign Ontario is now less enthusiastic about universalpharmacarethanthe previous provincial Liberal government under which Hoskinsserved?

Hoskinssaid he met with Ontario's new health minister, Christine Elliott, last Fridayand came away very happy with the conversation and her commitment to his work. "I was gratified to get her support," he said.

But it's early days and no model hasbeenbeen chosen yet.

What's he hearing so far in his listening tour?Hoskinssaidprovinces "expect any nationalpharmacareprogram to enhance the access to drugs to their population,not take that access awayand I fully agree with that."

And that's the crux of his challenge: the mix of drug benefit programs offered across Canadagivessome people more coverage than others, depending on where they live. To be successful,Hoskinsmustproposea system that helpseveryone more equally, at hopefully a lower costor at least one people are prepared to pay.

"I'm confident that we'll create a model that suits Canada," he said.

Hoskins said he's looking to create something that will cross party lines and be built to last even if it takes a few years for every province to sign on, just like the early days of Canada's medicare system.

"If we do our job right, it should not be dependent on one government or another government, one province or another province," he said.

By the fall, his team will begin crunching data and figuring out what models might work. His final advice to the federal ministers of health and finance is due next spring.

It's a short timeline, he admits, but it's also something that's been studied for a long time already.

'Not all on the same wavelength'

While other items on the Council of the Federation's agenda threaten to split premiers into rival camps the Trans Mountain pipeline, for example, or the issue of a carbon taxtheirtalks on Friday, focused primarily on health care issues,like theopioidcrisis and joint procurement of high-tech medical equipment, couldyielda greater consensus.

"Consensus is a big word," said Linda Silas, president of the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions (CFNU) that'sorganizingFriday's breakfast."The only consensus we have is that something has to be done."

The public healthadvocacy group has organizedsimilar breakfasts for the last fewyears, and while not every premier attends, the majority do.

Also speaking atthis year's roundtable isformer parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page,whose Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracyreleased new research on pharmacarethis week.

Liberal MP John Oliver, a former health care executive who now sits on the House of Commons standing committee on health, will also speak on his committee's recommendations fromlast spring.

"To be honest, they're not all on the same wavelength on what has to be done," Silassaid.

"It's a political decision:On Friday our job is to convince the 13 premiers that you need to stick together and make sure your role in delivering health care includes making sure that patients get the prescriptions they need."

Research released byher organization last spring suggests more than 1,000 patients with heart disease and diabetes may die prematurely every year fromnottakingthe medication they need because ofits cost.

"Patients are actually dying because we don't have a system," she said.

$62B'wasted'

While there are no easy solutions,Hoskinshas made it clear what kind of work is required, Silassaid. He's telling stakeholders not to submit another paper saying why we needpharmacare, she said.

"We know that," Silas said."Come with a paper to tell us how to do it."

As for the cost, an earlier reportreleased by the CFNUsaid Canada wasted $62 billion between 2006 and 2015 because it didn't have a co-ordinatedpharmacareprogram.

When the premiers realize this, Silas said, the need for change should beobvious.

"How do we rejig it so that we cover it the right way?" she said. "Right now we're making big pharma rich,and the insurance companies. Like, really?"