How to make technology greener? End planned obsolescence

It's the time of year when those who are lucky may find a shiny, new device under the tree, and others may snag one during Boxing Week sales.

But too often, the shine comes off those new devices far sooner than weexpect.

Many of us are frustrated by how soon new high-tech devices like smartphones break or just don't work as well anymore, forcing us to replace them a concept sometimescalled "planned obsolescence."

But it doesn't have to be that way. Advocates say not only is it possible for manufacturers to make longer-lasting, easier-to-repair devices, but it's necessary on an Earthwith limited resources.

"I think people understand that they're sort of locked into a racket with technology like phones and televisions and computers, where there's no such thing as a device that you keep for a long time," said Rolf Skar, a special project manager at the environmental group, Greenpeace USA.

"Part of that is the development of better technologies, but it can't be denied that part of it is they're planning to sell you another phone in a year and half."

WATCH | Why your waterproof phone may not be covered for water damage:

Why your 'waterproof' cellphone may not be covered for water damage

5 years ago

Duration 2:39

It's every smartphone owner's nightmare. You go into a washroom and accidentally drop your phone into the bowl. Fortunately many devices today are now water-resistant meaning they should survive splashes, spills and even being submerged in water. But that warranty doesn't necessarily cover you for water damage, or if your phone "leaks."

The big footprint of new devices

The short lifespan of many consumer electronics comes at a high environmental cost. The devices, as well asapps and services such as streaming video, use a lot of energy. It's a problem companies such as Google and Apple have tried to address by investing in green energy.

But 85 to 95 per cent of a smartphone's carbon footprint comes from production, according to researchers from McMaster University in Hamilton. That's partlydue to the energy that goes into mining gold and rare-earth elements used topower the devices.

"We focus a lot of our attention on energy use, but we don't always focus attention on materials use," said Colleen Thorpe, executive director of quiterre, a Canadian non-profit organization focused on sustainability.

Extracting and using up the Earth's resources through practices such as mining has a huge impact, andnot just on carbon emissions.

"It really devastates landscapes [and] creates lots of pollution," Thorpe said. "Every time we take materials from the natural world we're having an impact on biodiversity because we're going into habitats and we're taking trees from animals."

Mining can also have a negative impact on local communities, and the mining of someelements used in smartphones is linked to conflicts and human rights abuses. Not to mention that before long, devices oftenend up as potentially hazardous e-waste, which the UN says is one of the fastest growing waste streams in the world, comprising 53.6 million tonnes in 2019, up 21 per cent in just five years. Of that, only 17.4 per cent is formally collected and recycled.

For all those reasons, Thorpe saidit's important to try to use as few resources as possible "and when we make something, that it lasts as long as possible."

WATCH | The environmental footprint of smartphones:

The environmental impact of smartphones

5 years ago

Duration 2:50

Smartphones and apps used on them have a surprisingly large carbon footprint thanks to the power that go into storing and maintaining data. Some Canadian companies are working on reducing that impact.

Why don't devices last longer?

But most of us know from experience that many of our devices aren't built to last.

A survey of 2,200 Canadians commissioned by quiterre in 2018 found 44 per cent kept their electronic devices for fewerthan three years and 61 per cent kept their devices forfewer than five years. More than four-fifths of respondents said theythought home appliances and electronics were in most or some cases designed to have a short lifespan. The survey was part of a study intended to get a better understanding of obsolescence in Canada.

"The designing of something and the marketing of something right now is geared to making people consume," said Thorpe.

A 2017 Greenpeace USA report on greener electronics its most recent on that topic found that many high-end phones at that time, such as the LG G6 and the Samsung Galaxy 8 were increasingly breakable. "The latter has been reported to be one of the most breakable phones of all time due to the edge-to-edge glass on both sides," it said.

Adding to consumer frustration is that devices often aren't repairable, or they cost more to fix than to replace.

Greenpeace found that among 40 best-selling gadgets, it was difficult or impossible to replace commonly failing parts, such as the battery or display in nearly 70 per cent. It also noted a trend among LG and Samsung toward making phones less repairable; efforts by Apple and Sony to block environmental standards to encourage the design of devices that are easier to repair, upgrade and disassemble for recycling; and said tablets and laptops design by Microsoft often require damaging the device to access it for repairs.

"It makes more sense to sell more things and not to repair things or upgrade things," said Greenpeace's Skar, who has worked on acampaign to hold big technology companies accountable for their environmental footprint. "They simply make more money."

Is obsolescence really 'planned?'

Still, there is a debate about whether obsolescence is"planned."

In some cases, as when companies put out a new phone model every six months or every year to encourage consumers to buy again, Thorpe argues it is.

Accusations of planned obsolescence were behind a recent class-action lawsuit against Apple. The company agreed in March to pay up to $500 million US to settle the suit alleging its software upgrades slowed down older iPhones as it launched new models, misleading them to believe their phones were near the end of their life cycles and needed to be replaced.

WATCH |Apple under fire for allegations of controversial business practices:

Apple under fire for allegations of controversial business practices

6 years ago

Duration 18:12

The National goes undercover to investigate some of Apple's controversial business practices including allegations of overpriced repair charges and the battery/slowdown scandal.

But Thorpe saidmany players, including consumers, contribute to obsolescence.Suppliers may only be able to support so many software versions or stock so many parts, for example. Or technology or standards may change significantly.

What are some solutions?

Advocates say the first step is to recognize the problem.

"We need to make it clear for people why it is good to keep your phone five years," saidMiquel Ballester, co-founder of Fairphone, a Dutch social enterprise that sells smartphones designed to be durable and more sustainable.

One of his company's goals is providing examples of different ways of doing things "things you can scale up."

He said that can also encourage governments to make laws thatpush industry to make changes.

Make phones and other technology modular

Making devices modular helps solve the problem of obsolescence due to technological advances.

"So you can basically buy and upgrade, as you would with lots of other things, rather than having to buy the whole device," Skar said.

This is the approach that Fairphone took in creatingof its Android phone (which isn't available in Canada). The company recently came out with a new camera modulethat users could use to upgrade their old phones.

Modular devices are also more repairable, as individual parts are designed to be swapped in and out.

Require devices to be repairable and design them to be

Some tech companies have been accused of deliberately making it hard to repair their devices.

A CBC News investigation in 2018 found Apple often overestimatedthe cost of repairs to its products and threatenedthird-party shops willing to fix them for less. (Apple said its customers were best served by "certified experts using genuine parts").

WATCH | How do-it-yourself cellphone repairs can reduce trash:

How do-it-yourself cellphone repairs can reduce trash

4 years ago

Duration 2:10

Carolyn Aubry of Ottawa talks about repairing a cellphone she bought from a company in Europe that aims to lessen the environmental impact of broken devices.

IFixit, an online community that helps people repair their own devices, says manufacturers often impede repairs by using large amounts of hard-to-remove glue, soldering major components together, refusing to sell replacement parts and threatening to void your warranty if you open the device, using proprietary screws.

To counter this, some jurisdictions have implemented "right-to-repair" laws for certain products. For example, they may.

• Oblige suppliers to keep spare parts in stock. For example, new EU rules starting 2021 require appliance manufacturers to supply spare parts for 10 years.

• Provide incentives for repairs, such as tax breaks. Sweden has done that for some product repairs.

• Require labels that rank a product's repairability, as France is doing starting January 2021 on products that include smartphones and laptops.

quiterre's report suggestedthat governments can also lead by example, by consideringcriteria such as product lifespan when making their own purchases and by buying refurbished products.

Find new ways to do business and make money

Of course, one of the big barriers to change is that companies profit from encouraging consumers to upgrade their devices early and often.

One starting point is to remove some of the incentives for doing that, quiterresuggested, by encouraging phone plans that don't include a phone or converting customer loyalty points into advantages that don't involve buying something.

Thorpe said customers definitely have a role to play. "We have to develop new reflexes to think before we purchase, to consume less and consume more wisely."

She encourages people to ask questions when they buy something about how to ensure it lasts longer. "Because this sends a strong message."

There are no technological barriers stopping companies from making more durable products, said Skar.

"They just need to see a way where it rewards their bottom line," he said.

"Companies, if they hear you don't want to be having to buy a new phone two years from now, they'll figure out a way to make money without selling a new phone."