Space junk is raining from the sky. Who's responsible when it hits the Earth?

In March 2022, a couple living in the ruraltown of So Mateus do Sul, Brazil, were shocked to find a 600-kilogram piece of smashed metal lying just 50 metres from their home.

Four months later, two Australian sheep farmers found a strange, black object that appeared to have embedded itself in a field.

Then last week, a farmer in Ituna, Sask., foundasimilar object in his wheat field.

Alien invasion? Nope. All pieces of SpaceX debris that had fallen from the sky.

In the past, these events were rare. Instead, it was often said thatbecause our planet is more than 70 per cent ocean, the chances of space debris reaching the groundin a populated areawere slim.

While that is still largely true, the chances may be on the rise,saidCassandra Steer,the deputy director of mission specialistsat Australian National University's Institute for Space.

WATCH |Saskatchewan farmer finds part of a SpaceX rocket in his field:

Saskatchewan farmer finds part of a SpaceX rocket in his field

4 months ago

Duration 1:53

Barry Sawchuk and his son were out in his field planning this year's seeding when they found what they thought at first was garbage, but it turned out to be the remains of a SpaceX rocket re-entry from back in February.

"The odds are increasing just because of the amount of space traffic that we are creating,"she said."I mean, in the first50 years of [spaceflight]since 1957,when Sputnik was launched, there were something like 2,000 launches in total.

"These days, we're seeing 1,000 launches per year."

This leads to a bigquestion: Who is responsible for this space debris?

The answer is complicated. There are a few United Nations agreements in place, but for the most part, it's rare for any one country to take another country to international court over space junk.

Space law

Yes, space law is a thing.

The Outer Space Treaty, of which Canada is a signatory, wasadopted in 1967 to governthe peaceful use of space. Itsays that countries are liable for any damage caused by space objects they've launched. Commercial activities are covered by the treaty's Liability Convention, Steer said.

"The Liability Convention says if there's damage caused on Earth, or in the air, then it's absolute liability," she said."In other words, you don't have to prove faults, you just have to figure out where this debris came from."

That convention was put to the test in 1978, when aSoviet nuclear satellite called Cosmos 954 re-entered Earth's atmosphere and exploded over Northern Canada,scatteringradioactive debris frompresent-day Nunavut tonorthern Alberta. The Canadian government spent more than $14 million CAD in cleanup efforts.

Canada used the LiabilityConvention to request$4.4 million in compensation from the Soviet Union. In the end, itreceived$3 million.

In addition to physical damage,countries could potentially seek compensation foreconomic costs that come from planes or ships being forced to divert due to debris re-entry, said Ewan Wright, a PhD candidate at the University of British Columbia studying the sustainability of the outer space environment.

Geopolitical tensions can also influence how countries respond to suchincidents,hesaid.

"The states are wary of setting a precedent because, you know, last month it was U.S. debris hitting Canada. But what if it was Canadian debris hitting China?"

In response to last week's incident,the Canadian Space Agency said, "We are working with our partners at Global Affairs Canada and Department of National Defence on the management of space debris."

There might not be any liability issues to sort out in this particular case. That's because liabilityhangs on one word: damage.

And since no damage was done, the U.S.the country where the debris originated has no real obligation.

A growing problem

What fell in Barry Sawchuk's Saskatchewan fieldwas part of a private SpaceX missioncalled Axiom-3.

Many people are aware that SpaceX returns the first stage of their rockets to be reused again and again. But there is also a second stage to those rockets, andin some casessuch as with the Axiom missions and resupply missions to the International Space Station (ISS)a trunk that holds pressurized cargo. Both of those are expected to fall out of orbiton their own and burn up completely as they re-enter the Earth's atmosphere.

But tell that toSawchuk.

Samantha Lawler,an associate professor of astronomy at the University of Regina who keeps a close eye on satellites and their orbits, said it's concerning that the Saskatchewan debrismade it to Earth.

"The farmer found a one-hundred-pound piece of junk, four feet by six feet," she said. "It's huge. So yeah, clearly it is not burning up, and others in the area have found other pieces, too."

Part of that may be explained by the materials used in the rockets like carbon fibre, which was used in that SpaceX trunk. While aluminum will burn up fairly well, carbon fibredoesn't.

This isn't just a SpaceX problem. In 2023, a massive cylindrical object washed up on shorein Western Australia. The Australian Space Agency reported that it was part of alaunch vehicle from India's space agency.

There have also been incidents involving space junk from China. In 2007, a plane narrowly avoided being hit by Russian space debris.And last month, a piece of space junk from the ISS that was expected to burn up ended up slamming through the roof and two floors of a Florida home.

Chances of being hit

And that's what's most concerning:that one day debris will hit a planeor someone on the ground.

AaronBoley is an associate professor at UBC'sphysics and astronomy department and co-director at the Outer Space Institute,a group ofexperts dedicated to space exploration.He's been crunching the numbers on orbital debris re-entering Earth's atmosphere.

"There's a lot of work that's been done on this. And people have been kind of screaming and pounding things and saying, 'Look, you can't just keep dropping things thinking it's not going to matter,'" he said.

He's deeply concerned that people are looking the other way.

"[NASA] said it was going to entirely demise and ablate in the atmosphere and instead somebody had something that went through their roof, went through the firstfloor, went throughthe next floor," he said. "And so there are all these assumptions that I think we are seeing being challenged just because there's so much activity taking place right now."

For the most part, space companies and agencies are responsible for the end of life of their satellites and rockets. For some, that means putting them in ahigh orbit that is a sort of graveyard around Earth.Othersuse their craft's remaining fuel to do a controlled de-orbit.

But then there are those spent rocket stages that are left to orbit Earth. The planet is always pulling them down, so eventually their orbits "decay" and they fall back down, and they don't always burn up in the atmosphere when they do.

So whatarethe chances ofspace debris crashing into a person?

"We estimate the chance of somebody getting hit by one of the rocket bodies over the next 10 years to be about 20 to 30 per cent," PhD candidate Wright said. "So that worked out to about a three or fourper centchance each year that someone, somewhere will get hit by a piece of space debris."

Part of that also has to do with how much ourpopulation has increased sincethe start of the space program.

With a record number of launches every year, the risk is only going to grow, Wright said.

"We're putting thousands of satellites up and nothing is really being done about this re-entry issue. And even if we stop launching today, there would still be space debris that comes down over the next century."