Brazil's Supreme Court allows X to resume service

Brazil's Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared X to resume service in the country on Tuesday after the social media platform reversed course and started complying with court rulings that billionaire owner Elon Musk had previously vowed to resist.

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who has been locked in a months-long feud with Musk, gave X the green light to resume operations in Latin America's largest country effective immediately.

In the decision, Moraes saidX had met all the necessary requirements to start operating again in the country.

The platform formerly called Twitterhad been suspended in Brazil, one of its largest and most-coveted markets, since late August after not complying with court orders related to hate speech moderation and failing to name a legal representative in the country, as required by law.

Musk, who had denounced the orders as censorship and called Moraes a "dictator," backed down and started to reverse his position in recent weeks, with X blocking ordered accounts, tapping a local representative and paying pending fines.

Moraes, in his Tuesday decision, ruled that Brazil's telecommunications regulator Anatel must work to allow X to come back online in the country within 24 hours.Users in Brazil were still unable to access the platform as of 7 p.m. local time.

Through its Global Affairs account, X said it was proud to return to Brazil, adding that it "will continue to defend freedom of speech, within the boundaries of the law" in the countries where it operates.

The Brazil dispute was one of a series of recent face-offs between Musk, who views himself as a champion of free speech, and governments including Australia and the United Kingdom seeking to prevent the spread of online misinformation.

'A victory for the country': minister

Brazil's communication minister said on Tuesday that X's decision to pay the fines and comply with court orders was a "victory for the country."

"We showed the world that here our laws should be respected, by whomever it may be," Juscelino Filho said in a statement.

X's suspension initially came after an individual ruling by Moraes, who has spearheaded a local crusade against perceived attacks on democracy and the political use of disinformation. His ruling was later unanimously backed by a five-member panel of the Supreme Court and its chief justice.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva also voiced support for the move, saying that people with businesses in Brazil must follow local laws and the world was "not obliged to put up with Musk's far-right ideology just because he is rich."

Justices flagged at the time, however, that they would be open to reconsidering the suspension if X complied with rulings. The social media company initially said it would not abide by them because they were "illegal."

Brazil is X's sixth-biggest market globally and as of April had about 21.5 million users, according to data platform Statista. During the suspension, many users migrated to rival platforms such as Bluesky and Meta Platforms-owned Threads.

X had legal representation in Brazil until mid-August, when it decided to close its offices in the country due to the orders from the court, which it dubbed "censorship orders," without naming someone to assume legal responsibilities for the firm locally. That eventually triggered the suspension, in a judicial battle that also affected another prominent business controlled by Musk, satellite internet provider Starlink, whose accounts Moraes temporarily froze in order to cover fines imposed on X.

A new X representative, lawyer Rachel de Oliveira Conceicao, was tapped in late September, when X also said it had started to block accounts ordered by the court.

Earlier this month, the firm paid pending fines it had previously disdained, opening the door for reinstatement in the country.

Hoping for ad revenue

Musk's decision to reverse course in Brazil after publicly criticizing de Moraes isn't surprising, said Matteo Ceurvels, research firm Emarketer's analyst for Latin America and Spain.

"The move was pragmatic, likely driven by the economic consequences of losing access to millions of users ... along with the millions of dollars in associated advertising revenue," Ceurvels said.

"Although X may not be a top priority for most advertisers in Brazil, the platform needs them more than they need it."