Indictment unsealed: Trump faces 37 charges related to national security

It was billed as the gravest legal threat to Donald Trump and now we know why: He faces criminal charges that are sweeping in scopeand staggering intheir severity.

An indictment unsealed Friday details 37charges against the former U.S. president, related to national securityfor improperlystashing classified documents, showing them off,and then lying to authorities about them.

The potential risk to Trump extends far beyond his 2024 presidential run.

Put simply, in the words of a Fox News legal analyst, digesting on air what he referred to asa damningindictment: A conviction could result in Trump spending his final years in prison.

The case before a Florida court accuses Trumpof storing secret informationonU.S. nuclear programs, military vulnerabilities, and retaliation strategies of the U.S. and its allies all kept at a property being visited by tens of thousands of people:Trump's Mar-a-Lago dwelling and club.

They were stored in a bathroom, a ballroom, his bedroom, a showerand a storage room.Some even sat scattered on the floor, including one document belonging to Five Eyes, theintelligence alliance that includes Canada.

The indictment further accuses Trump of improperly showing off these documents to writers working on a bookandto an ally in a political action committee.

In these conversations, federal authorities say, Trump explicitly statedthat he knew he shouldn't be showing these documents, a potentially incriminating detail authorities will use in court.

One of those conversations was allegedlyrecorded.

"This is secret information. Look at this," Trump was allegedly heard saying,speaking to authors working with his former chief of staff on a book.

"Isn't that incredible? As president, I could have declassified it. Now I can't, you know, but this is still a secret."

He allegedly showed those authors details of a military attack plan against an undisclosed country, which U.S. mediareports sayinvolved Iran.

A staff member interjected, according to the indictment, to say: "Now we have a problem."

Potentially,it turns out, a serious problem.

Several of the alleged crimes carry a maximum of 20 years in prison. The counts range from violations of the Espionage Act for wilful retention of defence documents, to corruptly concealing public records, to obstruction of justice.

In a months-long cat-and-mouse game with federal officials, the indictment saysTrump instructed aides to hide documents, making comments like,"Wouldn't it be better if we just told them we don't have anything here?"

As he unsealed the 49-page indictment Friday, special counsel Jack Smith, the prosecutor,invited members of the public to explore it before making up their minds about the case.

"I invite everyone to read it in full to understand the scope and the gravity of the crimes charged," Smith said in a brief media appearance.

The chargingdocument accuses Trump of imperilling the country's security, relations with foreign alliesand human sources who work to collect intelligence.

Smith insisted his process was independent and apolitical, with the charges approved by a grand jury.He sought to pre-empt inevitable accusations that it amounts to a partisan political hit: "Our nation's commitment to the rule of law sets an example for the world."

Mindful of the looming presidential election, he promised to seek a speedy trial.

The former president had announced Thursday he'dbeen indicted and ordered to appear in a Miami court next Tuesday.

As with all things Trump, chaotic news has kept coming: In the span of hours, Trump declaredan aide,Walt Nauta, will also be charged; announced a shakeupof his legal team as some lawyers resigned for unstated reasons;and mostbut not alltop Republicans furiously closed ranks around him.

"I'm an innocent man," Trump said in a video late Thursday. "This is warfare for the law. We can't let it happen."

So the breaker of political barriers is about to bust a new one. The first president to be impeached twice. He recently became the first ex-president charged with a crime. On Friday, he became the first ex-president charged twice,and the first charged with federal crimes.

ABC News reportsthat the judge assigned to the initial hearing has a history with this case;Aileen Cannonis the same Trump-appointed judge who sided with him earlier in procedural decisions that slowedthe investigation, until she was overturned andcriticized by an appeals court.

This is the gravest legal threatTrump has ever faced, theone most likely to rattle his political comeback and imperil his freedom. It's in a different legal league than his earlier arrest this spring on New York state charges of hush money payments to hide a sexual affair.

Even some vocal Trump criticsquestioned that earlier arrest, calling those charges weak. His former attorney general, Bill Barr, called it a miscarriage of justice.

Barr views this case differently.

"I've said for a while that I think this is the most dangerous legal risk facing the former president," Barr told CBS earlier this week, speaking of the documents investigation.

"From what I've seen there's substantial evidence there. There's no excuse for what he did here."

Trump argueshe had the right to take the documents and, if he's charged, why wouldn't President Joe Biden be too, given his own mishandling ofnumerous classified documents?

What makes Trump's case different, Barr said, is how his former boss behaved when federal authorities told him in 2021 they wanted the documents returned.

Media reports say Smith has been questioning people in Trump's orbit about whether he knowingly lied, and directed others to lie afterward.

"This would have gone nowhere had the president just returned the documents. But he jerked [the government] around for a year and a half," Barr said this week, while insistinghe does not view this case as a witch hunt.

He suggests this case could do actual political damage, as the public learns about it.

WATCH l Trump the 1st president to face federal indictment:

Trump says he's been indicted in classified documents case

1 year ago

Duration 1:57

It would be a first. The former president has retained near-unassailable loyalty from Republican voters through past scandals.

The earlier charges against Trump did absolutely nothing to dim his political prospects. He is crushing the field in the race for the Republican presidential nomination and, if anything, his lead has only strengthened since his first arrest.

Even in a general-election matchup, early polls suggest a close race where Trump stands a chance of defeating Biden and returning to power on Jan. 20, 2025, just over 48 months after a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol.

The only safe prediction at this point? His legal fight will become the centre of gravity in the 2024 Republican presidential primary, with everything orbiting around it.

Republican congressman: 'War phase'

Rival candidates will be forced to take positions: Are you with him or against him? Will you pardon him if elected, or not? Will you speak out on his behalf? What are you doing to fight back?

It's happening already.

One primary rival, Vivek Ramaswamy, immediately declared Thursday, with the indictment details still secret, that, if elected president, he would pardon Trump on his first day in office.

Trump's most serious primary rival didn't go quite that far, but Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis denounced the indictment and promised to reform the Justice Department.

Congressional Republicans are hinting they'll fight back against the government, using their investigative power: "[We] will hold this brazen weaponization of power accountable," tweeted House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

Some are using more threatening language.

One Republican lawmaker tweeted: "We have now reached a war phase. Eye for an eye." Another Republican congressman tweeted what sounded like battleplans.

Fox News on Thursday night featured a parade of Trump defenders. There was no airtime in Fox's prime-time lineup for Trump critics like Chris Christie, or for former vice-president Mike Pence, who in media interviews is taking a more nuanced view.

On Fox, even occasional Trump rivals were rallying to his side. South Carolina lawmaker Nancy Mace whom Trump tried to unseat in a primary castigated the charges as political.

"Make no mistake," Mace said. "This is the executive branch tonight trying to take out their No. 1 opponent."

She predicted: "Joe Biden just secured Donald Trump's nomination."

Watching the general public reaction

To be clear, Mace's remark notwithstanding these charges would have been recommended by a special counsel appointed by Biden's attorney general and would have been approved by a grand jury. Biden said Thursday he's had no information on the case.

One Trump ally called on rival primary candidates to suspend their campaigns and show up in Miami next Tuesday to protest in support of Trump, their opponent.

So don't hold your breath for a right-wing repudiation of Trump. The broader electorate, meanwhile, remains an open question.

Just 23 per cent of Americans believe Trump should be allowed to serve as president again if convicted of a serious crime, says a recentYahoo News/YouGov poll

Let's see how serious they think this is.