'The curse of the lottery': Why a multimillion-dollar jackpot winner is fighting to keep identity private

A New Hampshire woman who won a $560-million US jackpot in thePowerball lotteryis fighting toremain anonymous because she could bea potential target for scams, harassment, threats, violence and murder.

This, at least, is the argument being made by her lawyersagainstthe New Hampshire Lottery Commission, which insists that the woman, known as Jane Doe, must reveal her identity in order to collect her prize.

The battle has gone to the state's Supreme Court, where the woman's legal team has argued sheshouldnot be forced to reveal her identity, because she is now"part of a small demographic which has been historically victimized by the unscrupulous with life-threatening consequences."

"There are countlessstoriesof other lottery winners who have suffered significantly after receiving their money, many of which could have been avoided if the winners' identities had not been provided," the Doe complaint reads.

• Powerballlottery winner files court complaint to remain anonymous
• $758MUSPowerballlottery winner ready to 'sit back and relax'
• Should a $560Mlottery winner be allowed to remain anonymous?

When a lottery company publishes the name of a big jackpot winner, there are "many different combinations [of things] that could happen to you," her lawyer, Bill Shaheen, told CBC."Why do it?"

While millions of lottery players continue to participate in hopes of that big payoff, Jane Doe's case demonstrates that winning can comewith itsown set of challenges, concerns and stresses.

Hitting the jackpot does not always lead toa new happy life.

'Suffered significantly'

In the U.S., only a handful of statesallow the winners of jackpots to remain anonymous by law. In Canada, each province has its own lottery rules, but they're generally similar. For example, a B.C. couple who won $50 million fought unsuccessfully to keep their identities a secret.

The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) publishes thetown or city ofresidenceof all winners of$1,000 or more. If it's a $10,000 win, the winner's picture is taken as well.

But those news conferences where a giant cheque is presented to a big jackpot winner?They are not mandatory.

"We love it when they want to share their story, what they might do with the money, how they found out they won, but that is optional," said DitaKuhtey, a spokesperson for the OLG.

• Mysterious $50M Lotto Max winners finally revealed
• Hamilton-area couple become multimillionaires with $23.3M lotto win

New York-based attorney JasonKurland known as "The Lottery Lawyer" for the number of lottery-winner clients he has represented said he sympathizes with those who would like to stay anonymous.

"I see these winners, they are petrified. When you win that amount of money, it'soverwhelming," saidKurland. "And the last thing you want is everyone knocking down your door."

Lottery horror stories

In arguing the case forprivacy, Doe's complaint cites a number of horror stories. It points to the case of a2016winner in Georgia who won a relatively small jackpot of$434,000 US. She was murdered by an armed gunmanwho shot through herdoor, demanding money.

Theargumentalso referencesa $30-million US Florida lottery winner who was murdered in 2009 by a woman posing as a financial advisor.

As well, the complaint refers to thefts, swindles and threats of a handful ofother winners.

Some have argued that apart from having to reveal their identity, many people are just not prepared to handle the sudden influx of cash.

"It's just upheaval that they're not ready for," said DonMcNay,a financial consultant and the author ofLife Lessons from the Lottery,in an interview withTime magazine in 2016.

"It's the curse of the lottery, because it made their lives worse instead of improving them."

Researchon the well-being of individuals after a win seems to provide mixed results, and finding winners willing to provide financial information is challenging.

Still, stories of lottery wins gone wrong abound, including the case of West Virginiaman Jack Whittaker,who won $315 million US in 2002.He later said hewas beset by a number of legal problems and personal tragedies, including the breakup of his marriage and thedeath of hisdrug-addicted granddaughter.

"I think if you have something, there's always someone else that wants it,"Whittaker told ABC News in 2007. "I wish I'd torn that ticket up."

Then there'sHamilton'sSharon Tirabassi, who, according to the Hamilton Spectator,spent her $10.5 million winningson expensive clothes, trips and parties. Sheended up depleting her winnings andliving paychequeto paychequewitha part-time job.

'Not substantiated'

But not all agree with the doom-and-gloom scenarios, especiallythe lottery corporations.

In its response to Jane Doe, the New Hampshire Lottery Commission dismissed her security concerns as "not substantiated" and "inconsistent" with the commission'sexperiencedealing with jackpot winners.

In fact,the lottery corporations believe they have a strong case to make for why winners' identities should be revealed.

TheNew Hampshire Lottery Commission arguedthat the practiceensurestransparency in a public lottery and confirmationthat the winners are actual people andpickedat random.

OLG's Kuhtey said there are cases when exceptions are made, such as whenthere's a specific, known threat to a winner's safety, issues of domestic violence or the winner is an undercover law enforcement officer.

But Shaheensaid he believes the lotterieshaveother motives to identify the winners.

"I think the real reason is they like the publicity," he said. But what lottery corporationsexpose winners to, "when you put it on a scale, is just unbelievable."

Kurlandacknowledgedthat identifying winners isa wayto dispel the notion that the games are rigged.But he said the companies arealso trying to sell as many tickets as possible and being able to show thatan average person can win is the best marketing, he said.

"It adds a face to thestory rather than just saying 'Oh, you'rean anonymousperson.' It makes more peoplebuy tickets."