What the Kyle Lowry shove tells us about tensions between NBA players and owners - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 24, 2024, 12:20 AM | Calgary | -12.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
World

What the Kyle Lowry shove tells us about tensions between NBA players and owners

The shove of Toronto Raptors guard Kyle Lowry by Golden State Warriors minority shareholder Mark Stevens during Game 3 of the NBA Finals not only set off a debate about courtside behaviour, it's also put the spotlight back on simmering tensions between players and owners.

The Game 3 incident involving Raptors star shines spotlight on debate about use of word 'owner' in NBA

Toronto Raptors player Kyle Lowry is pushed by Golden State Warriors minority investor Mark Stevens after falling into the seats after a play during Game 3 of the 2019 NBA Finals at Oracle Arena in Oakland, Calif., on Wednesday night. (Lachlan Cunningham/Getty Images)

The shove of Toronto Raptors guard Kyle Lowry by Golden State Warriors minority shareholder Mark Stevens during Game 3 of the NBA Finals not only set off a debate about courtside behaviour, it's also put the spotlight back on simmering tensions between players and owners.

Stevens was fined $500,000 US and given a one-year banfromgames and team activities for shovingLowryduring the fourth quarter of the playoff game, after Lowrysailed into a row of courtside fans in an attempt to keep alive a loose ball.

Lowry wasunequivocal when speaking to reporters about the incident afterward."A guy like that showed his true class. A guy like that shouldn't be part of our league," he said.

Stevens, a venture capitalist worth an estimated $2.3 billion US, later apologized for his actions in a statement, saying he took full responsibility for his actions.

But some argue Stevens's actions were symptomatic of a bigger issue: that the owners see players as property. And that view has led to a movement by some calling for a ban of the term "owner" from the NBA lexicon.

The idea was first proposed by Golden State Warriors forward Draymond Green in 2017. At the time, he was responding to alleged comments made by Bob McNair, the owner of the NFL's Houston Texans, who reportedly said of the national anthem protests sparked by quarterback Colin Kaepernick: "We can't have the inmates running the prison."

Taking toInstagram, Green wrote: "Let's stop using the word owner and maybe use the word chairman. To be owned by someone just sets a bad precedent to start. It sets the wrong tone. It gives one the wrong mindset."

Draymond Green says NBA players are 'definitely vulnerable' when on the court:

Draymond Green on Lowry being pushed: 'Players are definitely vulnerable'

5 years ago
Duration 3:53
The Warriors' forward praised Kyle Lowry's reaction after he was pushed by a Golden State investor in Game 3.

Language matters

The racial sensitivity of the issue and connotations to slavery struck a nerve with many players, said former Washington Wizards forward Etan Thomas, who noted he calledWizards' owner Ted Leonsis "CEO" during his time with the team.

"With a history as ugly as the one in America, I would think that people would want to completely distance themselves from anything that could even remotely be connected to slavery," said Thomas.

"Language matters and history matters. When crafting descriptions, you have to be sensitive to the people who are predominantly in the league. It's disrespectful if you don't."

Kyle Lowry speaks about being shoved in Game 3:

'Hopefully he never comes to another NBA game,' Kyle Lowry on ejected fan

5 years ago
Duration 0:35
Following Toronto's win in Game 3 of the NBA Finals, Lowry spoke about the importance of playing with pace and his altercation with a Golden State fan.

A recent report from TMZ Sports suggests the idea may be getting traction, suggesting multiple teams have had high-level discussions about doing away with the term "owner." The report also says the Philadelphia 76ers and Los Angeles Clippers have already changed their policy, using terms like managing orlimited partnersand chairman.

"If there was a predominately Jewish league, you wouldn't use a term that could be connected in any way, shape or form to the Holocaust," Thomas said.

Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment (MLSE), the parent company of the Toronto Raptors, declined a request for comment.

But not everyone sees the term owner as a negative. Former player Stephen Jackson, speaking on ESPN's The Jump, said the term can be empowering.

"I think people are looking too deep into the word 'owner,'"Jackson said. "I love the word owner.I own a company and I love that I can tell my kids, or people that didn't expect me to be where I'm at, to tell them 'I own a company."

In another discussion on the topic onThe Shop, an HBO talk show starring LeBron James,rapper Snoop Dogg put it bluntly: "I own my own s--t.I like that word, f--k that."

Ownership mentality

While some may see the issue as a question of semantics, others, like Martenzie Johnson, a senior researcher with ESPN site The Undefeated, argues that it's not the word "owner," butrather an"ownership mentality" that's at the root of the problem and what manifestedin the Lowry-Stevens incident.

"If you have this title 'owner,' you have this ownership mentality.You believe the players belong to you, that they are your property, that they are just your assets," Johnson said.

Johnson is of the opinion thatStevens may not have acted that way in his regular workplace, but because of the racial composition of the league nearly 75 per centof its players are blackthe Warriors minority stakeholder felt he was entitled to put his hands on Lowry.

When asked about the idea of an "ownership mentality," Lowry agreed that some owners can make players feel more like assets than human beings.

"Not all of them, but certain ones, yes. AndI can say for sure that guy makes me feel like that," Lowry said."Mark Stevens, whatever his name is, makes me feel like he's one of those guys."

Kyle Lowrysays things would've been 'a lot different' if he had shoved a fan:

Kyle Lowry on his reaction to shove: 'Things could have been a lot different if ... I put my hands on him'

5 years ago
Duration 1:31
Lowry spoke to the media on Thursday, a day after he was pushed by Warriors' investor Mark Stevens during Game 3 of the NBA Finals.

Lowry himself said he supports the idea of dropping the word ownerfrom the NBA.

Even if the debate around the use of the term is relatively new, the league has a recent history of taking a firm line against bad behaviour by owners.

In April 2014, the NBAhanded down a lifetime ban and $2.5 million US fine toDonald Sterlingafter a recording was released in which thethen Los Angeles Clippers owner made racist remarks. Sterling was also forced to sell the team.

A good first step

It's not clear if Stevens will be forced to divest his stake in the Golden State Warriors, but Johnson saidthe ban is a good first step.

"Outwardly, [the NBA] is saying that this is something that we can't tolerate.But the idea that they're going to change people's opinions about black athletes overnight, I'm not sure of that."

Etan Thomas said the fine and suspension sends a good message. He credits NBA Commissioner Adam Silver for giving players a platform to speak their mindssomething players in other leagues aren't as free to do.

"He is a lot more progressive, he listens to the players, he protects the players, values their thoughts and opinions and feelings in a way that David Stern never did," said Thomas, referring to the previous NBA commissioner.

And Thomas said he hopes teams across the NBA do away with the term "owner."

"The NBA has embraced the new wave of activism, instead of attempting to silence it and make an example out of a player, like the NFL did with Colin Kaepernick."

Kyle Lowry's full press conference (question about whether NBA should abandon the term "owner" comes at the three-minute mark):