Tech Bytes: What's in a name? McAfee's 'parasitic' podcast - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 24, 2024, 03:48 AM | Calgary | -12.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Tech Bytes: What's in a name? McAfee's 'parasitic' podcast
Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

What's in a name? McAfee's 'parasitic' podcast

by Saleem Khan, CBC News Online

A third blog post in a row touching on the theme of parasites might seem to be too much which is why I held off posting this item yesterday. The culprit this time is computer security and antivirus software vendor McAfee Inc.

McAfee launched its official podcast yesterday. The bimonthly show is hosted by the company's Avert Labs staffers security research and communications manager David Marcus and field research engineer Jim Walter.

The podcast's goal, McAfee says, is "to dissect the issues, drivers and trends of security" something they say they don't always have time to do in the face of dealing with malware threats day-to-day along with other routine security tasks.

From disclosure to zero-day trends to rootkit functionality and everything between, McAfee says its new podcast "will be there to beat that issue into submission with its two opinionated hosts and a variety of the security industrys finest minds."

They're also clear about what it won't be:


If you are looking for lists of malware and threats, look elsewhere. If you are looking for news on the latest malware in the wild sorry, wrong podcast.

If you are, however, looking for highly-caffeinated commentary and heated arguments on the tenets and pillars of the security industry well then, we got your back.

Where does the parasite theme mentioned at the top of this post come into play, you ask? It's the podcast's unfortunate name: AudioParasitics. Their tag line: "AudioParasitics Take the red pill."

Clearly, the name is the product of a brainstorming session gone terribly wrong. Whoever came up with it likely meant it as an allusion to an unwanted circuit component but they likely assumed too much. It's especially unfortunate in light of MAfee's recent troubles.

For the few who didn't quite catch the "red pill" reference that the Matrix-philes did [I'm looking at you, Heather] here is the red pill/blue pill scene in context. Or you can just rent the movie.

The first episode of the AudioParasitics podcast covers the Nordea Bank phishing incident and the first of a two-part discussion on information disclosure. You can also subscribe to the AudioParasitics RSS feed.

« Previous Post |Main| Next Post »

This discussion is nowOpen. Submit your Comment.

« Previous Post |Main| Next Post »

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published will not be edited. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Note: Due to volume there will be a delay before your comment is processed. Your comment will go through even if you leave this page immediately afterwards.

Privacy Policy | Submissions Policy

Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

World »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Canada »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Politics »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Health »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Arts & Entertainment»

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Technology & Science »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Money »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Consumer Life »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Sports »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Diversions »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
more »