Tech Bytes: Apple chops prices with metal iMacs - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 27, 2024, 05:47 PM | Calgary | -9.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Tech Bytes: Apple chops prices with metal iMacs
Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

Apple chops prices with metal iMacs

by Dan Westell, CBCNews.ca

Apple has cut the prices on its new, glossy iMacs, and it looks like the price drop was bigger in Canada than the U.S.

The new machines are skinnier than their predecessors. Apple gushes that the iMac's new look is also "gorgeous," with its aluminum and glass casing. The latest iMac line has bells and whistles such as iLife 08 to manage and share videos and photos, and the machines are more powerful than previous models, the company says.

The price of the latest iMacs is down by $350 to $400 for a Canadian buyer, and $200 to $300 south of the border, compared to previous models. Americans will pay $1,199 for the 20 inch version; Apple Canada wants $1,299. The price gap is the same for the 24-inch screen; the ask is $1,799 US, $1899 Cdn.

Time was, the difference in Canadian and U.S. prices was put down to the weak loonie. Well, that excuse is gone, and even Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is asking companies to cut prices because our buck is nearly at par with the U.S. greenback. So what about that last $100, Mr. Mac?

« Previous Post |Main| Next Post »

This discussion is nowOpen. Submit your Comment.

Comments

Charlie

Ontario

Regardless of the price, I've heard the horror stories of both Macs and PCs. In the end, I say iWon't be buying one of these.

Posted August 8, 2007 09:32 AM

Patrick

Montreal

Apple does make good computers. I've owned a couple and appreciate the solid, quality design.

However, I speak with experience. Apples crash, too; and a lot of peripherals don't have drivers for MacIntosh.

Posted August 8, 2007 09:53 PM

James Holmes

The new iMac is great BUT WAIT until osX 10.5 comes out - then it will be THE hot-button PC competiton

it seems everyone knows the quote:

"Once You Go Mac, You'll Never Go Back" - Steve Jobs

Posted August 9, 2007 12:27 AM

James Holmes

iThink the new iMacs are great, but i wont be getting one for a while.
If you wait until October, osX 10.5 will have been released, making the new Apple computers run more smoothly and with newer features than the current release, 10.4. Oh, and by the way ANY Apple product will outcompare the PC knockoffs.

If you are upset about the price, look at it this way - you will not have to spend a day setting it up, it's as simple as opening the box and plugging it in, you wont need to make any calls to tech support - because it runs beautifully, and you wont be complaining about the newest virus - because Macs are virtually insusceptible to viruses, spyware and trojans.

If all of the above doesnt convince you, then go to the Apple website and watch the funny TV advertisements comparing the Mac to a PC.

And, I'm sure we've all heard the quote:

"Once You Go Mac, You'll Never Go Back" - Steve Jobs

Posted August 9, 2007 11:30 AM

Garet

Winnipeg

Macs are great, if you don't want to do much on your computer. If you don't mind crap like bootcamp, and the fact you can only play several year old pc games on it, or like WOW mac edition, they're the computer for you.

But they sure look nice despite the lack of relative functionality.

Posted August 9, 2007 11:55 AM

Carolyn

James, I really hope you know that the Macs are nowhere near immune to getting viruses. Viruses on Macs aren't popular because, as of yet, Macs have not been as popular as PCs. This doesn't mean they won't soon put the PC into a race, giving it a run for its money... but at the same time, as the Mac grows more popular, so too will the amount of threats directed toward it.

Nothing in this world that draws this much attention is safe for long. There are people on this planet who live simply to ruin it for others and that is precisely what will eventually happen to the Mac once it becomes popular enough.

One more thing. The Mac vs PC commercials are all about bias. They ignore many of the better features of the PC in order to sell their own product. EVERYONE does this when in competition with someone; it's known as marketing. Marketing is ugly and unfair most of the time and Mac's commercials are no exception.

You should look up the other side to the arguement without taking a side. This way, you'll be able to see that both have their benefits and both have their misgivings.

At anyrate, I've said enough. :D

Posted August 9, 2007 12:06 PM

Garet

Winnipeg

Why is it a selling point that macs can now use the programs PC has been able to use for decades?

Posted August 9, 2007 12:46 PM

Claudio

Ontario

Sounds to me like James is already on the bandwagon :p Anyways, to each their own.

Good points from Carolyn and Garet. Apple is, in a sense, playing catch-up with PC's so they figure they can get people to switch by making PC's (and ultimately you and me) seem "uncool". Personally, I get put off by those Mac commercials. Just tell me the pros of owning a Mac and spare me the mud-slinging.

Posted August 9, 2007 01:48 PM

Garet

Winnipeg

Mac commercials are no different than political commercials. They always say how the opposition is so bad, but never how the candidate,who the commercial is for, is any good.

Posted August 9, 2007 02:58 PM

Charlie Bear

Ontario

I personally enjoy those commercials for their humourous value... but they grate on me a bit as they make the PC seem so ungainly. Try watching the PC Version of the PC vs Mac argument on YouTube. Those commercials are hilarious... including the poking at Linux.

Posted August 9, 2007 03:28 PM

Neil Fiertel

Alberta

I read the various pros and cons from those above regarding an iMac or Macs in general and I can only say...buy what you want and live with the consequences. Personally, I found the comment regarding Bootcamp very stupid and ignorant. For those that do not know, Bootcamp allows a Mac to run Windows native to the machine just as it runs on a Dell or similar machine. Now how bad can that be? Furthermore, there are several emulator programs that run nearly as fast as Native (as with Bootcamp) but have the decided advantage of running BOTH WINDOWS AND MAC SOFTWARE AT THE SAME TIME IN THE SAME WINDOW! Folks try that with a PC! I never had OSX crash once since the second version came out in 2002..Occasional software crashes happen of course but it does not take the computer down and therefore the hard drives and so forth are unaffected. It is not perfect but pretty close. By the way...I still use a 2001 model for serious work.slowish but steady and stable and also have a year old laptop as well. I have used Macs since 1994 and would never go back to Windows...period.

Posted August 11, 2007 02:48 AM

Ed

Halifax

Wow, it never ceases to amaze me how worked up people get over the Mac v. PC debate. To each their own. I have owned both and can see the value each. I have decided for my lifestyle and work that the mac best suits my needs. I have owned it for 4 years and it has never let me down. As stated previously everything just works straight out of the box. The integrated iLife makes sharing photos, and stories to family easy. Wireless connections are simple. No need for an IT degree.
The selling point Garet is the fact the mac can run BOTH OS's on the same machine. You can have the best of both worlds with a one time investment.
If you consider that most people use a computer for browsing the web, e-mail and basic word processing/ office functions then it really comes down to preference. Both machines will perform those functions very well.
While the mac isn't immune to viruses; as stated in a previous blog, they are less susceptable at his point because fewer people are writing malicious code for them. This means the average user doesn't have to worry about maintaining anti-virus software.
Try both and form your own opinion.

Posted August 11, 2007 03:31 AM

Matt Innes

I used to think Macs were pretty ridiculous, but my wife bought one a few years ago and it really is better than any Windows machine I've ever owned. No more messing around with virus scanners, trying to find the right drivers to make your stuff work, reinstalling the OS every six months because something is irretrievably broken, cleaning out the spyware, etc. etc.

Garet is right insofar as there are not a lot of games for the Mac. If gaming is your thing, don't buy a Mac. Or if you do buy a Mac, buy a copy of Windows too and just reboot into Windows when you want to play games.

Carolyn is correct that Macs are not technically immune to viruses. Nothing is. But it is a fact that the first EVER virus for Mac OSX was discovered in 2006, and there has never been a major outbreak.

Posted August 12, 2007 03:52 PM

Monkey

Winnipeg

Somewheres along the line of:

Mac-Hey PC let's linkup through our network
PC-Sure!Great idea!
Linux-Hey guys can I join?
Mac+PC-NO!

And as a side note, I've made enough comments on MAC on the MAC blog. Not going to start rambling again.

I WANT TO KICK STEVE JOBS IN THE NADS!

The iKick!

Posted August 13, 2007 01:56 AM

Emmanuel Schembri

Malta

I really despise reading comments on the lines of "Macs are less susceptible to viruses, PC's are." These comments show an absolute lack of understanding between the various components of a computer, the hardware, and its software. It is Windows that is susceptible to viruses, and, similarly, Mac OS that, apparently, is not susceptible to viruses, as yet (because viruses, being software, affect the coding, not the hardware). However, a so-called PC running a different operating system, such as, for instance, Linux, BSD or other UNIX variants has the same advantages... so if you're just buying a Mac because its 'not susceptible' to viruses, and it looks nice, you're likely being cheated of a good amount of cash. Like any decision, whether or not to by the so-called PC (by which we actually mean IBM compatible, which is the proper term) or Mac should be based on what you intend to use it for. And, Mac computers ARE PCs ... according to the definition any desktop computer, terminal, laptop, palmtop, and even cell-phone or microwave is a PC...

Posted August 13, 2007 03:28 AM

RobS

A computer is a mechanism which provides a platform for tools (software or hardware) to be used to create a product or provide a service.

Buy the right tool for your need first, your wants second and you'll be happier for it.

C= Amiga Forever!
8P

Posted August 13, 2007 01:35 PM

R.

Toronto

I use both a Mac and a Windows machine, and I much prefer the Mac. Essentially, as the marketing says, it just works. Yes, there are occassional crashes and issues. However, it is FAR more stable than Windows.

Also, there is far less tinkering that needs to be done with the OS to keep the computer running smoothly. On my Win PC I found that I was spending too much time on maintainance tasks (virus checks, spyware checks, defrags, etc, etc) when I really just wanted to focus on doing what I needed to do.

I think a lot of the people who prefer Windows are the type that like to tinker with their computer.

Posted August 14, 2007 02:27 PM

Erika

Vancouver

Garet, you're dissing a book you've never read.

Posted August 15, 2007 01:06 AM

Carolyn

Naturally! Windows has been around MUCH longer, so it has gone through many more tinkerings than the MAC, which already knows basically what people want, thus delivers. It's not super popular, thus it isn't being taxed upon so much by the stresses that are most definitely going to come get it.

Posted August 15, 2007 08:15 AM

Garet

Winnipeg

Erika, we've all been to elementary school, and as such, had enough experience with Macs.

But I used them for graphic arts a few years back. That and music are about all they're more useful for.

Posted August 15, 2007 12:20 PM

Richard Macintosh

Canada

I only have one thing to say about Macs,

Macs Rule PC's Drool. I had a Mac years ago and I am considering going back over again I just need to save up a little bit more money.

Posted August 15, 2007 01:49 PM

Steve

Oshawa

As a graphic artist, I have to agree with Garet. MACs work beautifully with simple programs... but they go straight to hell in a hand basket when you think of using them for a more complex program. That fancy handle on the MAC? More than once I've contemplated if it was made just for graphic artists who've got the urge to lob the thing at a brick wall.

Posted August 15, 2007 04:07 PM

« Previous Post |Main| Next Post »

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published will not be edited. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Note: Due to volume there will be a delay before your comment is processed. Your comment will go through even if you leave this page immediately afterwards.

Privacy Policy | Submissions Policy

Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

World »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Canada »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Politics »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Health »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Arts & Entertainment»

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Technology & Science »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Money »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Consumer Life »

302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Sports »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]302 Found

Found

The document has moved here.

more »

Diversions »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
more »